Raymond McGaugh v. CIR
Petitioner - Appellee: RAYMOND S. MCGAUGH
Respondent - Appellant: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Case Number: 16-2987
Filed: July 21, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 26, 2017 Summary McGaugh v. Commissioner Internal Revenue

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 703021012 Filed opinion of the court by District Judge DeGuilio. AFFIRMED. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge and Jon E. DeGuilio, District Court Judge. [6850262-1] [6850262] [16-2987]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Raymond McGaugh v. CIR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellee: RAYMOND S. MCGAUGH
Represented By: Eric C. Onyango
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellant: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Represented By: Jacob Earl Christensen
Represented By: Gilbert Steven Rothenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?