Gregory White v. Gregg Scott, et al
JAMES T. DIMAS, ERIC KUNKEL, CHRISTOPHER CLAYTON, SHAN JUMPER, SHARLENE CARAWAY and GREGG SCOTT |
GREGORY A. WHITE |
20-1973 |
June 9, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 9 Docketing Statement filed by Appellees Sharlene Caraway and Shan Jumper. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [9] [7093838] [20-1973] (Unrath, Craig) [Entered: 07/15/2020 02:43 PM] |
Filing 8 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Gregory A. White. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [8] [7092364] [20-1973] (DRS) [Entered: 07/09/2020 01:54 PM] |
![]() |
Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Gregory A. White to extend time to file the docketing statement. [6] [7090048] [20-1973] (CM) [Entered: 06/29/2020 04:20 PM] |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 Motion filed by Appellees Sharlene Caraway and Shan Jumper for stay Appeal. [3] [7086932] [20-1973] (Unrath, Craig) [Entered: 06/15/2020 09:52 AM] |
Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Craig L. Unrath for Appellees Sharlene Caraway and Shan Jumper. [2] [7086885] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [20-1973] [Edited 06/15/2020 by CG to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Unrath, Craig) [Entered: 06/15/2020 08:31 AM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP. Transcript information sheet due by 06/23/2020. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Gregory A. White by 06/16/2020. Appellant's brief due on or before 07/20/2020 for Gregory A. White. [1] [7085955] [20-1973] (AD) [Entered: 06/09/2020 12:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.