Scott Troogstad, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
| SCOTT TROOGSTAD, MARCUS HARRIS, GARY DUSZAK, TIMOTHY SERBIN and RAUL DE LEON |
| CITY OF CHICAGO and JAY R. PRITZKER, Governor |
| 21-3371 |
| December 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 NOTICE: Attorney Frank Henry Bieszczat for Appellee Jay R. Pritzker will not be available for oral argument March 22-24, 2022. [20] [7217578] [21-3371] (Bieszczat, Frank) [Entered: 02/16/2022 09:59 AM] |
Filing 19
ORDER: This matter comes before the court on review of the Plaintiffs Amended Jurisdictional Statement filed by attorney Jonathan Lubin on February 10, 2022. That review reveals that counsel still has not provided the correct date that the notice of appeal was filed. Attorney Lubin must explain why he has not done so. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that attorney Lubin provide what he was ordered to do, and to do so no later than February 18, 2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the rule to show cause issued to attorney Lubin on February 10, 2022, is SUSPENDED pending counsels compliance with the courts order of February 1, 2022. [19] [7217379] [21-3371] (ER) [Entered: 02/15/2022 02:18 PM]
|
| Filing 18 Filed Showcause Response by Appellants Raul De Leon, Gary Duszak, Marcus Harris, Timothy Serbin and Scott Troogstad Attorney Jonathan Lubin to Show-Cause Order. [18][7216586] [21-3371] (Lubin, Jonathan) [Entered: 02/10/2022 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 17 Amended Jurisdictional Statement filed by Appellants Raul De Leon, Gary Duszak, Marcus Harris, Timothy Serbin and Scott Troogstad. [17] [7216571] [21-3371] (Lubin, Jonathan) [Entered: 02/10/2022 12:20 PM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders attorney Jonathan Lubin to show cause for his failure to respond to the court's order of February 1, 2022. Attorney Jonathan Lubin shall file his response on or before February 16, 2022. Counsel is advised that failure to respond may result in monetary or disciplinary sanctions. DW [16] [7216550] [21-3371] (AP) [Entered: 02/10/2022 11:52 AM]
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER: Appellants shall file a paper captioned Amended Jurisdictional Statement no later than February 8, 2022, that corrects the information noted above and otherwise complies with all the requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(4) and Circuit Rule 28(a). The Clerk shall DISTRIBUTE, along with the briefs in this appeal, copies of this order and appellants Amended Jurisdictional Statement to the assigned merits panel. (See order for further details). DW [15] [7214741] [21-3371] (HTP) [Entered: 02/01/2022 02:31 PM]
|
| Filing 14 Paper copies of appellant brief filed by Appellants Raul De Leon, Gary Duszak, Marcus Harris, Timothy Serbin and Scott Troogstad. [14] [7214531] [21-3371] (CAH) [Entered: 02/01/2022 08:43 AM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER: On consideration of the statements of the parties concerning the consolidation of this appeal with 21-3231, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal may be argued on the same day before the same panel as Appeal Nos. 21-3200 and 21-3231, if the court deems it appropriate after having reviewed the briefs in the three appeals. DW [13] [7212848] [21-3371] (HTP) [Entered: 01/24/2022 11:45 AM]
|
| Filing 12 Appellant's brief filed by Appellants Raul De Leon, Gary Duszak, Marcus Harris, Timothy Serbin and Scott Troogstad. Paper copies due on 01/28/2022. Electronically Transmitted. REMINDER: Hearing notices are mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, no later than the filing of the appellant's brief in a criminal case and the filing of an appellee's brief in a civil case. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3). The court's calendar is located at http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [12] [7212679] [21-3371] (SK) [Entered: 01/21/2022 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 11 Submitted appellant brief by Jonathan Lubin for Appellants Scott Troogstad, Timothy Serbin, Marcus Harris, Gary Duszak and Raul De Leon. [11] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7212560] [21-3371] (Lubin, Jonathan) [Entered: 01/21/2022 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 10 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellants Scott Troogstad, Timothy Serbin, Gary Duszak, Raul De Leon and Marcus Harris. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [10] [7211691] [21-3371] (Lubin, Jonathan) [Entered: 01/18/2022 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 9 Objection to consolidation of appeal Statement of Jurisdiction filed by Appellee City of Chicago. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [9] [7211671] [21-3371]--[Edited 01/18/2022 by FP to reflect the correct document type.] (Warner, Michael) [Entered: 01/18/2022 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Statement by Appellee Jay R. Pritzker Attorney Frank H. Bieszczat to court order of 1/10/22. [8][7211526] [21-3371] (Bieszczat, Frank) [Entered: 01/18/2022 11:36 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The court, on its own initiative, ORDERS both appellants and appellees to file, on or before January 18, 2022, a Statement advising the court whether this appeal should be consolidated with Appeal No. 21-3231 for purposes of briefing and/or disposition. DW [7] [7210140] [21-3371] (AD) [Entered: 01/10/2022 04:39 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Appellants shall file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the omitted information noted in this order. The statement is due on or before January 18, 2022. (See order for further details) DW [6] [7210050] [21-3371] (AG) [Entered: 01/10/2022 03:02 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Appearance form filed by Attorney Frank H. Bieszczat for Appellee Jay R. Pritzker. [5] [7208500] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-3371]--[Edited 01/03/2022 by PS - to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Bieszczat, Frank) [Entered: 01/03/2022 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney William R. Pokorny for Appellee City of Chicago. [4] [7207872] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [21-3371]--[Edited 12/29/2021 by PS - to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Pokorny, William) [Entered: 12/29/2021 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Scott Troogstad. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 21-3200, 21-3231 [3] [7207431] [21-3371] (Lubin, Jonathan) [Entered: 12/27/2021 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLANTS: John Cunningham, Kenneth Brezina, Marzena Semrau, Michele Graber, John Knight, Michael Zach, Elvis Perez, Nicholas Fortuna, Meghan Michaelsen, James Walsh, Jeffrey Sutter, Jennifer Karaboyas, James Duignan, Nick Pantaleo, Stephen Hodo, David Martin, Daniel Rieger, Kelly Joiner, Julio Sanchez, Jr., Angela Bandstra, Philip Marx, Joseph Forchione, Mark Abratanski, Rich Clemens, Robert Tebbens, et al. [2] [7207401] [21-3371] (PS) [Entered: 12/27/2021 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Raul De Leon, Gary Duszak, Marcus Harris, Timothy Serbin and Scott Troogstad by 12/29/2021. Transcript information sheet due by 01/06/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 02/01/2022 for Raul De Leon, Gary Duszak, Marcus Harris, Timothy Serbin and Scott Troogstad. [1] [7207395] [21-3371] (PS) [Entered: 12/27/2021 11:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
