Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Rogers v. Quintana et al
as 3:2023cv01278
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Samuel Quintana, Perez and Marcus Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2022cv02177
Plaintiff:
Marcus Harris and Samantha Harris
Defendant:
Ronald L Hobbs, Triple D Supply L L C and Trisura Specialty Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02261
Plaintiff:
MARCUS HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott Troogstad, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 21-3371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT TROOGSTAD, MARCUS HARRIS, GARY DUSZAK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO and JAY R. PRITZKER, Governor
Troogstad et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv05600
Plaintiff:
Scott Troogstad, Marcus Harris, Gary Duszak and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Jay Pritzker and Jay Robert Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55622
Plaintiff:
MARCUS HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41730
Plaintiff:
MARCUS HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanley v. XL Towing & Storage, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02256
Defendant:
Sherry Di Vito, Pioneer Specialty Insurance Co., Marcus Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Mayo et al
as 5:2021cv00211
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Y Tipsword, K Blackman and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021hc02007
Petitioner:
Marcus Harris and Marcaus Harris
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
