Timothy Kingman v. Chris Frederickson, et al
TIMOTHY KINGMAN |
CHRIS FREDERICKSON, ANDREW LARSON, DAVID HOLT, STEVE SAUER and DANIEL GUILD |
22-1013 |
January 4, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Paper copies of appellant brief filed by Appellant Timothy Kingman. [16] [7220444] [22-1013] (LCP) [Entered: 03/02/2022 11:19 AM] |
Filing 15 Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Timothy Kingman. Paper copies due on 03/07/2022. Electronically Transmitted. REMINDER: Hearing notices are mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, no later than the filing of the appellant's brief in a criminal case and the filing of an appellee's brief in a civil case. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3). The court's calendar is located at http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [15] [7219813] [22-1013] (LJ) [Entered: 02/28/2022 11:32 AM] |
Filing 14 Submitted appellant brief by William R. Rettko for Appellant Timothy Kingman. [14] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7219781] [22-1013] (Rettko, William) [Entered: 02/28/2022 10:46 AM] |
Filing 13 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 02/28/2022 for Timothy Kingman. Appellees' briefs due on or before 03/30/2022 for Chris Frederickson, Daniel Guild, David Holt, Andrew Larson and Steve Sauer. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 04/20/2022 for Appellant Timothy Kingman. JB [7211378] [22-1013] (HTP) [Entered: 01/14/2022 04:10 PM] |
Filing 12 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted via Zoom, Friday, January 28, 2022 at 2:00pm. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. JB. [12] [7211371] [22-1013] (HTP) [Entered: 01/14/2022 04:05 PM] |
Filing 11 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellee Daniel Guild. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [11] [7211316] [22-1013] Amended Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Mr. Eric D. Kaplan for Appellee Daniel Guild. [11] [7211316] [22-1013]--[Edited 01/18/2022 by ER - to reflect correct type of document] (Kaplan, Eric) [Entered: 01/14/2022 02:15 PM] |
Filing 10 Amended Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Eric D. Kaplan for Appellee Daniel Guild. [10] [7211240] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1013]--[Edited 01/14/2022 by ER - correct version of document #9] (Kaplan, Eric) [Entered: 01/14/2022 12:01 PM] |
Filing 9 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Eric D. Kaplan for Appellee Daniel Guild. [9] [7211151] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1013]--[Edited 01/14/2022 by ER - Wrong document attached. Amended Disclosure Statement filed.] (Kaplan, Eric) [Entered: 01/14/2022 10:02 AM] |
Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Stacie E. Barhorst for Appellee Daniel Guild. [8] [7211143] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1013]--[Edited 01/14/2022 by FP to reflect that atty. Barhorst is added to the docket.] (Barhorst, Stacie) [Entered: 01/14/2022 09:41 AM] |
Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Thomas A. Cabush for Appellees Chris Frederickson, David Holt, Andrew Larson and Steve Sauer. Additional Parties: Ryan Rossing and City of Rhinelander. [7] [7210717] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1013] (Cabush, Thomas) [Entered: 01/12/2022 04:30 PM] |
Filing 6 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Michael J. King for Appellees Chris Frederickson, David Holt, Andrew Larson and Steve Sauer. Additional Parties: Ryan Rossing and City of Rhinelander. [6] [7210689] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1013]--[Edited 01/12/2022 by AD to reflect the addition of counsel.] (King, Michael) [Entered: 01/12/2022 03:29 PM] |
Filing 5 ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7210004] [5] [7210004] [22-1013] (MM) [Entered: 01/10/2022 02:33 PM] |
Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney William R. Rettko for Appellant Timothy Kingman. [4] [7209086] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1013] (Rettko, William) [Entered: 01/05/2022 04:06 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Timothy Kingman. [3] [7209063] [22-1013] (Rettko, William) [Entered: 01/05/2022 03:57 PM] |
Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Ryan Rossing and City of Rhinelander. [2] [7208869] [22-1013] (AG) [Entered: 01/05/2022 11:37 AM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 01/18/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 02/14/2022 for Timothy Kingman. [1] [7208857] [22-1013] (AG) [Entered: 01/05/2022 11:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.