Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Lee v. Riteway Truck and Auto et al
as 1:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Miles T. Lee
Defendant:
Riteway Truck and Auto doing business as KO Towing Comp, Mr. Ray Tews, Gregory, Dole, Calhoun, and Rogers LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lorendzo Holte v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al
as 23-10091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORENDZO DAVID HOLTE
Defendant / Appellee:
ASHLEY MOODY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, ED BROSKY and others
Lorendzo Holte v. Department of Revenue, et al
as 22-11851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORENDZO DAVID HOLTE
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHARLES DENTON, STEPHEN MATHEW WHYTE and others
Holte v. Moody et al
as 8:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
Lorendzo David Holte
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ed Brosky, Wendy Makholm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holte v. Department of Revenue et al
as 8:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Lorendzo David Holte
Defendant:
Department of Revenue, Charles Denton, Stephen Mathew Whyte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timothy Kingman v. Chris Frederickson, et al
as 22-1013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY KINGMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS FREDERICKSON, ANDREW LARSON, DAVID HOLT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-2661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-2635
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kalbaugh v. Holt et al
as 5:2021cv00173
Defendant:
David Holt, Wade Gourley, David Prater and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Duke Kalbaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaertner v. Sowell et al
as 4:2020cv01872
Defendant:
Sharron Williams, 2nd, Madison Hudson, Chase Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Gaertner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
