Patrick Atkinson v. Merrick Garland, et al
PATRICK ATKINSON |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States and MARVIN G. RICHARDSON |
FIREARMS POLICY COALITION and FPC ACTION FOUNDATION |
22-1557 |
April 5, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Patrick Atkinson v Merrick B. Garland |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Paper copies of amicus brief filed by Amici Curiae FPC Action Foundation and Firearms Policy Coalition. [16] [7238956] [22-1557] (SK) [Entered: 05/27/2022 09:41 AM] |
Filing 15 Paper copies of appellant brief filed by Appellant Patrick Atkinson. [15] [7238793] [22-1557] (LCP) [Entered: 05/26/2022 02:04 PM] |
Filing 14 Amicus brief filed by Amici Curiae FPC Action Foundation and Firearms Policy Coalition by consent. Paper copies due on 05/31/2022. Electronically Transmitted. [14] [7237858] [22-1557] (GW) [Entered: 05/23/2022 11:57 AM] |
Filing 13 Submitted brief by Joseph Greenlee for amicus Firearms Policy Coalition and FPC Action Foundation. Consent from all parties contained within brief. [13] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7237805] [22-1557] (Greenlee, Joseph) [Entered: 05/23/2022 10:06 AM] |
Filing 12 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Joseph Greenlee for Firearms Policy Coalition and FPC Action Foundation. [12] [7237799] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1557] (Greenlee, Joseph) [Entered: 05/23/2022 09:59 AM] |
Filing 11 Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Patrick Atkinson. Paper copies due on 05/25/2022. Electronically Transmitted. REMINDER: Hearing notices are mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, no later than the filing of the appellant's brief in a criminal case and the filing of an appellee's brief in a civil case. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3). The court's calendar is located at http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [11] [7237038] [22-1557] (MAN) [Entered: 05/18/2022 01:33 PM] |
Filing 10 Re-Submitted appellant brief by David G. Sigale for Appellant Patrick Atkinson. [10] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7237035] [22-1557] (Sigale, David) [Entered: 05/18/2022 01:31 PM] |
Filing 9 ORDER re: Motion for leave to file appellants' brief and required short appendix, instanter, filed on 5/17/2022. Because the tendered brief is procedurally deficient, the motion is DENIED. Counsel for the appellant shall electronically resubmit, by no later than May 25, 2022, a brief that complies with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the local Circuit Rules. Specifically, the resubmitted brief should be in a searchable, non-scanned PDF format. (For more information, counsel may refer to Electronic Case Filing Procedure (c)(3), which can be found on this courts website, or contact the clerk's office.) The new briefing schedule is as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 05/25/2022 for Patrick Atkinson. Appellees' brief due on or before 06/24/2022 for Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States and Marvin G. Richardson. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 07/15/2022 for Appellant Patrick Atkinson. [ # 8 ] CMD [9] [7236787] [22-1557] (FP) [Entered: 05/17/2022 04:08 PM] |
Filing 8 Instanter motion filed by Appellant Patrick Atkinson to file Appellant's Brief and Required Short Appendix. [8] [7236605] [22-1557] (Sigale, David) [Entered: 05/17/2022 10:34 AM] |
Filing 7 Brief deficiency letter sent to Appellant Patrick Atkinson. [7] [7236602] [22-1557] (MAN) [Entered: 05/17/2022 10:04 AM] |
Filing 6 Submitted appellant brief by David G. Sigale for Appellant Patrick Atkinson. [6] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7236561] [22-1557] (Sigale, David) [Entered: 05/17/2022 12:00 AM] |
Filing 5 Appearance form filed by Attorney Steven H. Hazel for Appellees Merrick B. Garland and Marvin G. Richardson. [5] [7233381] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [22-1557] [5] [7233381] [22-1557]--[Edited 05/02/2022 by HTP to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (Hazel, Steven) [Entered: 05/02/2022 03:21 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Patrick Atkinson. [4] [7229916] [22-1557] (Sigale, David) [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:42 PM] |
Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney David G. Sigale for Appellant Patrick Atkinson. [3] [7228554] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1557] (Sigale, David) [Entered: 04/08/2022 03:21 PM] |
Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Patrick Atkinson. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7228553] [22-1557] (Sigale, David) [Entered: 04/08/2022 03:19 PM] |
Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. Fee paid. Transcript information sheet due by 04/19/2022. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Patrick Atkinson by 04/12/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 05/16/2022 for Patrick Atkinson. [1] [7227913] [22-1557] (FP) [Entered: 04/06/2022 04:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.