Carmen Consolino, et al v. Thomas Dart, et al
CARMEN CONSOLINO, CYNTHIA CHUBB, ANTONIO BELK, VICTOR THOMAS, ANDRES GARCIA and ARETHA GERMANY |
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, ZELDA WHITTLER, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, MATTHEW BURKE, NNEKA JONES TAPIA and BRADLEY CURRY |
23-2967 |
October 12, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Marron A. Mahoney for Appellee Cook County, Illinois. [5] [7348727] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [23-2967]--[Edited 11/20/2023 by FP to reflect that atty. Mahoney is added to the docket.] (Mahoney, Marron) [Entered: 11/17/2023 04:22 PM] |
|
FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 11/01/2023 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7345353-2] [7345353] [23-2967] (PS) [Entered: 11/01/2023 03:38 PM] |
Filing 3 Motion filed by Appellants Antonio Belk, Cynthia Chubb, Carmen Consolino, Andres Garcia, Aretha Germany and Victor Thomas to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b). [3] [7345075] [23-2967] (MM) [Entered: 10/31/2023 01:32 PM] |
|
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Antonio Belk, Cynthia Chubb, Carmen Consolino, Andres Garcia, Aretha Germany and Victor Thomas by 10/17/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 10/26/2023. Appellants' brief due on or before 11/21/2023 for Antonio Belk, Cynthia Chubb, Carmen Consolino, Andres Garcia, Aretha Germany and Victor Thomas. [1] [7341334] [23-2967] (PS) [Entered: 10/12/2023 03:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.