Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02925
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07399
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Innovative Sports Management, Inc., d/b/a Integrated Sports Media v. Garcia Pinzon et al
as 5:2026cv09996
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc., d/b/a Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Carlos Andres Garcia Pinzon doing business as individually and d/b/a La Hacienda a/k/a Hacienda Bar Lounge, Carlos Felipe Pena Rengifo doing business as individually and d/b/a La Hacienda a/k/a Hacienda Bar Lounge and La Hacienda Bar Lounge Inc doing business as an unknown business entity d/b/a La Hacienda a/k/a Hacienda Bar Lounge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Hernandez v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2026cv02198
Plaintiff:
Andres Garcia Hernandez
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02080
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05260
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00677
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01442
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Saula et al v. Omta Tech Inc et al
as 1:2026cv03614
Plaintiff:
Edison Raul De La Cruz Saula, Emerson Ricardo Martinez Montero, Erick Geovanni Loboriel Garcia and others
Defendant:
Omta Tech Inc, Omer Tale, IIhan Oezgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
