Hannibal Eason v. State of Illinois, et al
| HANNIBAL EASON |
| STATE OF ILLINOIS, COUNTY OF COOK, CITY OF CHICAGO, OFFICE OF THE ILLINOIS STATE APPELLATE DEFENDER, OFFICE OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 26-3122 |
| October 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7563571] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General and Office of Cook County States Attorney has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [26-3122] (SCB) [Entered: 10/16/2026 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Hughes, Cook County States Attorneys Office, Cook County Public Defenders Office, and Cook County Circuit Court Criminal Division. [2] [7563567] [26-3122] (SCB) [Entered: 10/16/2026 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Hannibal Eason by 10/20/2026. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 11/16/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 10/29/2026. [1] [7563559] [26-3122] (SCB) [Entered: 10/16/2026 02:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
