Cecil Clayton v. Donald P. Roper
Petitioner - Appellant: Cecil Clayton
Respondent - Appellee: Al Luebbers and Donald P. Roper
Case Number: 06-3260
Filed: September 8, 2006
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 1, 2008 Cecil Clayton v. Donald P. Roper

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 920080201 Opinion
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cecil Clayton v. Donald P. Roper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: Cecil Clayton
Represented By: Elizabeth Unger Carlyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: Al Luebbers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: Donald P. Roper
Represented By: Andrew W. Hassell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?