Inez Hunter v. Ford Motor Company, et al
| Inez Hunter |
| Ford Motor Company, in Dearborn MI, Citi Financial Auto, ("CFA") a corporation in Bedford, TX, Hastings Automotive Inc., ("HAI"), in Hastings, MN, Dion Carpenter, an individual, Doug Ericksen, an individual and John Does, I through X, sued in their individual and official capacities whose identities are not yet known |
| 10-3288 |
| October 18, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Motor Vehicle |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK LETTER sent to appellant regarding request to enter new evidence. [4320993] [10-3288] (LAB) [Entered: 09/29/2015 12:08 PM] |
| Tendered Motion and Request to Enter New Evidence received from Appellant Ms. Inez Hunter [4320992] [10-3288] (LAB) [Entered: 09/29/2015 12:06 PM] |
| JUDGE ORDER:Denying [ # 4232959-2 ] motion to reopen and to vacate judgment filed by Appellant Ms. Inez Hunter. Scrg Feb 2011 [4248967] [10-3288] (LAB) [Entered: 02/27/2015 12:13 PM] |
| MOTION to reopen and to vacate this court's judgment of 03/01/2011, filed by Appellant Ms. Inez Hunter w/service 01/02/2015. [4232959] [10-3288] (LAB) [Entered: 01/09/2015 10:37 AM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [3782913] [10-3288] (SRD) [Entered: 05/02/2011 12:31 PM] |
| JUDGE ORDER:denying [ # 3768083-2 ] petition for enbanc rehearing filed by Appellant Ms. Inez Hunter. Petition for panel rehearing is also denied. Judge Michael J. Melloy took no part in the consideration or decision of this matter. Scrg Feb 2011 [3778321] [10-3288] (SRD) [Entered: 04/18/2011 02:45 PM] |
| PETITION for enbanc rehearing filed by Appellant Ms. Inez Hunter w/service 03/17/2011 [3768083] [10-3288] (SRD) [Entered: 03/17/2011 03:49 PM] |
| PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: KERMIT E. BYE, MORRIS S. ARNOLD and BOBBY E. SHEPHERD (UNPUBLISHED) [3760762] [10-3288] (SRD) [Entered: 03/01/2011 09:18 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - The judgment of the Originating Court is AFFIRMED in accordance with the opinion. KERMIT E. BYE, MORRIS S. ARNOLD and BOBBY E. SHEPHERD Scrg Feb 2011 [3760768] [10-3288] (SRD) [Entered: 03/01/2011 09:23 AM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Screening Case Submission before Judges Kermit E. Bye, Morris S. Arnold, Bobby E. Shepherd in St. Louis [10-3288] (SRD) [Entered: 02/23/2011 02:10 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT REPLY BRIEF filed by Ms. Inez Hunter ,. w/service 12/09/2010 12 PDF pages, NoAddendum 5 copies. Words/lines/pages6 pages [3734314] [10-3288] (ABC) [Entered: 12/14/2010 09:32 AM] |
| Paper copies Appellee/Respondent brief, [ # 3726488-2 ] filed by Ford Motor Company 10 paper copies received. [10-3288] (ABC) [Entered: 11/24/2010 03:32 PM] |
| Paper copies Appellee/Respondent brief, [ # 3726298-2 ] filed by Dion Carpenter, Doug Ericksen and Hastings Automotive Inc. 10 paper copies received. [10-3288] (ABC) [Entered: 11/23/2010 03:19 PM] |
| Paper copies Appellee/Respondent brief, [ # 3724492-2 ] filed by Citi Financial Auto 10 paper copies received. [10-3288] (ABC) [Entered: 11/23/2010 03:27 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Ford Motor Company, w/service 11/19/2010 21 PDF pages, w/Addendum. Words/lines/pages13 pgs Paper briefs from Ford Motor Company due 11/24/2010. [3726548] [10-3288]DUPLICATE ENTRY MADE IN ERROR. (YML) [Entered: 11/19/2010 04:42 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Ford Motor Company, w/service 11/19/2010 21 PDF pages,. Words/lines/pages13 pgs Paper briefs from Ford Motor Company due 11/24/2010. [3726488] [10-3288] (YML) [Entered: 11/19/2010 03:41 PM] |
| APPELLEE brief of Ford Motor Company submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. [10-3288] (BLV) [Entered: 11/19/2010 02:16 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Dion Carpenter, Doug Ericksen and Hastings Automotive Inc., w/service 11/18/2010 12 PDF pages,. Words/lines/pages6 pgs [3726298] [10-3288] Paper briefs due 11/24/10--[Edited 11/19/2010 by YML] (YML) [Entered: 11/19/2010 12:36 PM] |
| APPELLEE brief of Dion Carpenter, Doug Ericksen and Hastings Automotive Inc. submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. [10-3288] (MLS) [Entered: 11/18/2010 04:05 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Citi Financial Auto, w/service 11/15/2010 17 PDF pages,. Words/lines/pages12 pgs Paper briefs from Citi Financial Auto due 11/22/2010. [3724492] [10-3288] (YML) [Entered: 11/16/2010 10:37 AM] |
| APPELLEE brief of Citi Financial Auto submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. [10-3288] (KH) [Entered: 11/15/2010 02:56 PM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellees Dion Carpenter, Doug Ericksen and Hastings Automotive Inc.. - FOR CAL. [3720573] [10-3288] (MLS) [Entered: 11/03/2010 02:37 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FILED by Attorney Mr. Mark Lee Scholle for Appellees Hastings Automotive Inc., Dion Carpenter and Doug Ericksen w/service 11/03/2010 [3720490] [10-3288] (MLS) [Entered: 11/03/2010 12:55 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FILED by Attorney Mr. David Kelam Cole, III for Appellee Citi Financial Auto w/service 10/28/2010 [3718498] [10-3288] (KH) [Entered: 10/28/2010 03:04 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FILED by Attorney Mr. Kelly Hoversten for Appellee Citi Financial Auto w/service 10/28/2010 [3718496] [10-3288] (KH) [Entered: 10/28/2010 03:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FILED by Attorney Ms. Lucia Nale for Appellee Citi Financial Auto w/service 10/28/2010 [3718499] [10-3288] (KH) [Entered: 10/28/2010 03:05 PM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Citi Financial Auto. - FOR CAL. [3718588] [10-3288] (KH) [Entered: 10/28/2010 05:00 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FILED by Attorney Mr. Brian Vander Pol for Appellee Ford Motor Company w/service 10/28/2010 [3718577] [10-3288] (BLV) [Entered: 10/28/2010 04:34 PM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Ford Motor Company. - FOR CAL. [3717315] [10-3288] (BLV) [Entered: 10/26/2010 01:48 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Ms. Inez Hunter , w/service 10/19/2010 USCA17 PDF pages, NoAddendum 5 copies. Words/lines/pages10 pages Brief of Ford Motor Company, et al. due on 11/19/2010 [3715138] [10-3288] (ABC) [Entered: 10/20/2010 10:39 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, R&R filed 07/28/10, order and judgment filed 08/24/10 adopting R&R, order filed 08/31/10 denying motion for relief from judgment, order filed 09/23/10 denying motion for reconsideration, and order filed 10/04/10 granting ifp on appeal, docket entries link, [3714117] [10-3288] (JMM) [Entered: 10/18/2010 11:40 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. Transcript due on or before 11/29/2010. BRIEF APPELLANT, Inez Hunter due 12/07/2010 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. Appellant reply brief is due 14 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee brief. [3714129] [10-3288] (JMM) [Entered: 10/18/2010 11:48 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [3714095] [10-3288] (JMM) [Entered: 10/18/2010 11:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
