Dean Davidson v. State of Missouri, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: Dean Bryan Davidson
Respondent / Appellee: State of Missouri and Attorney General, Jeremiah Nixon
Case Number: 10-3432
Filed: November 2, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2011 MANDATE ISSUED. [3757718] [10-3432] (MR) [Entered: 02/18/2011 03:39 PM]
January 28, 2011 JUDGMENT FILED - denying [ # 3719882-2 ] Application for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mr. Dean Bryan Davidson., COA DENIED. JAMES B. LOKEN, KERMIT E. BYE and RAYMOND W. GRUENDER Adp Feb 2011 [3749796] [10-3432] (MR) [Entered: 01/28/2011 10:30 AM]
December 23, 2010 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis/response to showcause order, filed by Party Mr. Dean Bryan Davidson. w/service 12/23/2010. [3738413] [10-3432] (JMH) [Entered: 12/23/2010 03:22 PM]
December 7, 2010 CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Dean Bryan Davidson due 12/21/2010 [3731764] [10-3432] (JMH) [Entered: 12/07/2010 10:40 AM]
November 2, 2010 APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability, notice of appeal filed 10/27/10, Order & Judgment filed 10/20/10, Order denying IFP & COA filed 10/29/10 & docket entries link filed by Appellant Mr. Dean Bryan Davidson w/service 11/02/2010 [3719882] [10-3432] (JMH) [Entered: 11/02/2010 10:49 AM]
November 2, 2010 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. Kindly submit these documents within 10 days. [3719883] [10-3432] (JMH) [Entered: 11/02/2010 10:50 AM]
November 2, 2010 Prisoner case docketed. [3719873] [10-3432] (JMH) [Entered: 11/02/2010 10:39 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dean Davidson v. State of Missouri, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Dean Bryan Davidson
Represented By: Dean Bryan Davidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: State of Missouri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Attorney General, Jeremiah Nixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?