Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual, etc. v. Brian Johnson
| Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual-Transgender Pride/Twin Cities, doing business as Twin Cities Pride |
| Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board |
| Brian Johnson |
| 11-1980 |
| May 4, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual, etc. v. Brian Johnson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual-Transgender Pride/Twin Cities, doing business as Twin Cities Pride | |
| Represented By: | Katherine K. Bruce |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board | |
| Represented By: | Brian F. Rice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Intervenor defendant - appellant: Brian Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Nathan W. Kellum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
