Charles Dickinson v. South Dakota Lottery
Charles S. Dickinson |
South Dakota Lottery, Mainly Powerball |
12-2100 |
May 8, 2012 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Copyright |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 CLERK ORDER:for limited remand This case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of determining the appellant's IFP status and assessment of the docketing fees pursuant to 28 USC Section 1915 as amended by PLRA. [3909153] [12-2100] (CYZ) |
Filing 2 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, order of 4/19/12 [3909150] [12-2100] (CYZ) |
Filing 1 Prisoner case docketed. [3909141] [12-2100] (CYZ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Charles Dickinson v. South Dakota Lottery | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: Charles S. Dickinson | |
Represented By: | Charles S. Dickinson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: South Dakota Lottery, Mainly Powerball | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.