Scott Johnson v. Mead Johnson & Company

Plaintiff - Appellant: Scott Johnson, as guardian ad litem of H.T.P., a minor
Defendant - Appellee: Mead Johnson & Company, LLC
Case Number: 13-1685
Filed: March 27, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury-Product Liability

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
June 6, 2014 Summary Johnson v. Mead Johnson & Co.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 6, 2014 802438457 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Lavenski R. Smith, C. Arlen Beam and Duane Benton AUTHORING JUDGE:C. Arlen Beam The judgment of the originating court is REVERSED and REMANDED in accordance with the opinion. [4162070] [13-1685, 13-2681]
Search for this case: Scott Johnson v. Mead Johnson & Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Scott Johnson, as guardian ad litem of H.T.P., a minor
Represented By: Michael A. Anderson
Represented By: Kay Nord Hunt
Represented By: Stephen Carl Rathke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Mead Johnson & Company, LLC
Represented By: Margaret P. Daday
Represented By: Jonathon T. Naples
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.