United States v. John Nelson

Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: $48,100.00 in United States Currency
Claimant - Appellant: John R. Nelson
Case Number: 13-1902
Filed: April 23, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Property Seizures

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
June 27, 2014 Summary United States v. Nelson

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 27, 2014 802454587 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Kermit E. Bye and Duane Benton AUTHORING JUDGE:Kermit E. Bye (PUBLISHED) [4169689] [13-1902]
Search for this case: United States v. John Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Nancy A. Svoboda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $48,100.00 in United States Currency
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant - appellant: John R. Nelson
Represented By: Patrick Cavanaugh Brennan
Represented By: John R. Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.