Twin City Pipe Trades Service v. O'Laughlin Plumbing & Heating
Plaintiff - Appellant: Twin City Pipe Trades Service Association, Inc., a Minnesota non-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellee: Frank O'Laughlin Plumbing & Heating Company, a Minnesota corporation, doing business as O'Laughlin Plumbing & Heating
Case Number: 13-2521
Filed: July 15, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 17, 2014 Summary Twin City Pipe Trades Service v. O'Laughlin Plumbing & Heating

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Twin City Pipe Trades Service v. O'Laughlin Plumbing & Heating
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Twin City Pipe Trades Service Association, Inc., a Minnesota non-profit corporation
Represented By: William Allan Cumming
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Frank O'Laughlin Plumbing & Heating Company, a Minnesota corporation, doing business as O'Laughlin Plumbing & Heating
Represented By: Phillip P. Hansen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?