Mark Christeson v. Don Roper
Petitioner - Appellant: Mark Christeson
Respondent - Appellee: Don Roper
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant(s): Former Federal and State Judges
Case Number: 14-3389
Filed: October 23, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mark Christeson v. Don Roper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: Mark Christeson
Represented By: Eric W. Butts
Represented By: Mark Christeson
Represented By: Philip Horwitz
Represented By: Jennifer A. Merrigan
Represented By: Joseph J. Perkovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: Don Roper
Represented By: Stephen David Hawke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus on behalf of appellant(s): Former Federal and State Judges
Represented By: John Daniel McAnnar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?