Anthony Ford v. Corizon Medical Services, et al
| Anthony Butler Ford |
| Corizon Medical Services, Michael Hakala and Ian Wallace, Warden, SECC Individually |
| 15-2815 |
| August 19, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [4353466] [15-2815] (CMD) [Entered: 01/07/2016 09:05 AM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - Motion to dismiss appeal filed by Mr. Anthony Butler Ford. w/service 12/28/2015 [4353474] [15-2815] No action taken. Judgment summarily affirming was entered on 12/17/2016. (CMD) [Entered: 01/07/2016 09:11 AM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent regarding Mr. Ford's motion to dismiss. Advised we will take no action as case was summarily affirmed on 12/17/2015. [4353476] [15-2815] (CMD) [Entered: 01/07/2016 09:15 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Granting [ # 4316352-2 ] motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Anthony Butler Ford. The full $505 appellate filing and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. Appellant may pay the filing fee in installments in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b). The court remands the assessment and collection of those fees to the district court. This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A.. DIANA E. MURPHY, STEVEN M. COLLOTON and BOBBY E. SHEPHERD Adp Dec 2015 [4347487] [15-2815] (CMD) [Entered: 12/17/2015 06:52 AM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 15-2815: plra] [4347650] [15-2815] (CMD) [Entered: 12/17/2015 10:27 AM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Diana E. Murphy, Steven M. Colloton, Bobby E. Shepherd in St. Louis [4347486] [15-2815] (CMD) [Entered: 12/17/2015 06:42 AM] |
| INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Mr. Anthony Butler Ford on 09/29/2015. [4330236] [15-2815] (DMW) [Entered: 10/27/2015 07:52 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit and inmate account statement, filed by Appellant Mr. Anthony Butler Ford--w/service by USCA8 on 09/15/2015. [4316352] [15-2815] (DMW) [Entered: 09/15/2015 10:33 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum and Order of 6/8/15; Order of Dismissal of 6/8/15; Memorandum & Order of 8/7/15; Order of Partial dismissal of 12-17-2014; Order of 8-7-15. [4307465] [15-2815] (DMW) [Entered: 08/19/2015 10:56 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 09/16/2015, this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [4307466] [15-2815] (DMW) [Entered: 08/19/2015 10:57 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4307468] [15-2815] (DMW) [Entered: 08/19/2015 11:00 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4307452] [15-2815] (DMW) [Entered: 08/19/2015 10:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
