Selena Capers v. Nat'l Railroad Passenger Corp.
| Salena Capers, also known as Jane Doe, No. 49 |
| National Railroad Passenger Corporation, a Congressionally Incorporated Corporation, also known as Amtrak |
| 16-1171 |
| January 21, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Assualt/Libel/Lander |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Selena Capers v. Nat'l Railroad Passenger Corp. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Selena Capers v. Nat'l Railroad Passenger Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: Salena Capers, also known as Jane Doe, No. 49 | |
| Represented By: | John Paul Byrd |
| Represented By: | Joseph D. Gates |
| Represented By: | Stuart S. Mermelstein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: National Railroad Passenger Corporation, a Congressionally Incorporated Corporation, also known as Amtrak | |
| Represented By: | Kristopher B. Knox |
| Represented By: | Mary K. McCarroll |
| Represented By: | Scott Harper Tucker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
