United States v. Maurice Freeman
| Maurice Freeman |
| United States of America |
| 19-1034 |
| January 7, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Maurice Freeman w/service by USCA-8 on 03/01/2019 [4761786] [19-1034] (LMT) [Entered: 03/01/2019 04:28 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - DISMISSED. The appeal is hereby dismissed. The court's mandate will issue in due course. JAMES B. LOKEN, PASCO M. BOWMAN and DAVID R. STRAS Adp Feb 2019 [4757042] [19-1034] (LMT) [Entered: 02/15/2019 11:04 AM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Pasco M. Bowman, David R. Stras in St. Louis [4757040] [19-1034] (LMT) [Entered: 02/15/2019 11:01 AM] |
| RESPONSE in opposition to Statement of Case [ # 4750191-2 ] filed by Attorney Mr. David Alan Raskin for Appellee United States of America , w/service 02/11/2019. [4755204] [19-1034] (DAR) [Entered: 02/11/2019 10:22 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Granting [ # 4754360-2 ] motion for extension of time to file a response, until 2/11/2019, filed by Mr. David Alan Raskin. [4754520] [19-1034] (TMF) [Entered: 02/07/2019 03:22 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file response to Statement of Case, [ # 4750191-2 ], until 02/11/2019, filed by Attorney Mr. David Alan Raskin for Appellee United States of America w/service 02/07/2019. [4754360] [19-1034] (DAR) [Entered: 02/07/2019 12:21 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF THE CASE filed by Maurice Freeman. w/Service 01/28/2019 [4750191] [19-1034] (ALB) [Entered: 01/28/2019 02:41 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Anita L. Burns for Appellant Maurice Freeman w/service 01/28/2019 [4750187] [19-1034] (ALB) [Entered: 01/28/2019 02:39 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: This appeal pursuant to Fed.R. App. P. 9(a) was filed. Counsel was appointed and directed to submit a statement of the case in support of the appeal. No statement of the case has been filed. Appellant is directed to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The response is due in 14 days. Submission of the statement of the case will suffice to dissolve the show cause order. [4748446] [19-1034] (TMF) [Entered: 01/23/2019 12:53 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of Rule 9a notice of appeal 01/02/19, docket entries, Order 12/14/18. [4742753] [19-1034] (TMF) [Entered: 01/07/2019 01:32 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The Federal Public Defender is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this case. [4742866] [19-1034] (TMF) [Entered: 01/07/2019 03:11 PM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [4742738] [19-1034]--[Edited 01/07/2019 by TMF] (TMF) [Entered: 01/07/2019 12:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Maurice Freeman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Maurice Freeman | |
| Represented By: | Maurice Freeman |
| Represented By: | Anita L. Burns |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | David Alan Raskin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
