Vaughn Maxfield v. City of Kansas City, et al
Defendant / Appellee: Jane Doe 4, Unknown Open Facility, John Doe, I, Officer, Unknown Building, Jane Doe 1, Therapist, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3 and City of Kansas City
Plaintiff / Appellant: Vaughn Gary Maxfield
Case Number: 19-1061
Filed: January 9, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2019 DOCUMENT FILED - entitled "Federal Civil Complaint/Injunction" filed by Mr. Vaughn Gary Maxfield. w/service 03/06/2019. [4763588] [19-1061] (CMH) [Entered: 03/06/2019 05:10 PM]
February 26, 2019 DOCUMENT FILED - entitled "Motion to Amend" to amend complaint and add defendants filed by Mr. Vaughn Gary Maxfield. w/service 02/26/2019. [4760263] [19-1061] (CMH) [Entered: 02/26/2019 03:02 PM]
February 8, 2019 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. Vaughn Gary Maxfield w/service 02/12/2019. [4755688] [19-1061] (CMH) [Entered: 02/12/2019 11:00 AM]
January 9, 2019 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4743806] [19-1061] (CMH) [Entered: 01/09/2019 10:23 AM]
January 9, 2019 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order and Judgment both dated 11/30/2018, Order dated 12/17/2018 and Order dated 1/8/2019. [4743799] [19-1061]--[Edited 02/14/2019 by CMH] (CMH) [Entered: 01/09/2019 10:20 AM]
January 9, 2019 CLERK ORDER: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 02/06/2019, this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [4743801] [19-1061] (CMH) [Entered: 01/09/2019 10:21 AM]
January 9, 2019 Prisoner case docketed. [4743783] [19-1061] (CMH) [Entered: 01/09/2019 10:09 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Vaughn Maxfield v. City of Kansas City, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Jane Doe 4
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Unknown Open Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: John Doe, I, Officer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Unknown Building
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Jane Doe 1, Therapist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Jane Doe 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Jane Doe 3
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: City of Kansas City
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Vaughn Gary Maxfield
Represented By: Vaughn Gary Maxfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?