Douglas A. Kelley v. Gus Boosalis
| Gus Boosalis |
| Douglas Arthur Kelley, in his capacity as the PCI Liquidating Trustee for the PCI Liquidating Trust |
| 19-1079 |
| January 10, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 4756856-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Erwin O. Switzer, III. Brief of Gus Boosalis due 04/08/2019. Appendix due on 04/08/2019. [4757291] [19-1079] (JMM) [Entered: 02/19/2019 07:34 AM] |
| CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Mr. Erwin O. Switzer, III for Appellant Mr. Gus Boosalis correcting [ # 4756856-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Attorney. [4756928] [19-1079] (EOS) [Entered: 02/15/2019 09:07 AM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 04/08/2019, filed by Attorney Mr. Erwin O. Switzer, III for Appellant Mr. Gus Boosalis w/service 02/14/2019. [4756856] [19-1079] (EOS) [Entered: 02/14/2019 04:13 PM] |
| On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions/petitions filed under [Rule 27/Rule 5/Rule 21/Rule 35/Rule 40], certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion/petition did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion for extension of time to file brief, [ # 4756856-2 ], submitted by Mr. Erwin O. Switzer, III in 19-1079 , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [19-1079] (JMM) [Entered: 02/14/2019 04:39 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - HEARING TRANSCRIPT, 1 volumes, Location STL, Comments: Final Pretrial Conference and Motions Hearing [Copy do not return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / MN, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 11/16/2018, No. of Pgs.: 76, Court Reporter: Bebault, Carla R [4756376] [19-1079] (STL) [Entered: 02/13/2019 02:26 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - TRIAL TRANSCRIPT, 1 volumes, Location STL, Comments: Voir Dire Proceedings [Copy do not return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / MN, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 11/26/2018, No. of Pgs.: 88, Court Reporter: Bebault, Carla R [4755260] [19-1079] (STL) [Entered: 02/11/2019 11:48 AM] |
| RECORD FILED - TRIAL TRANSCRIPT, 6 volumes, Location STL, Comments: Copies do not return to the District Court at end of case, Source Location: USDC / MN, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 11/26/2018 - 12/04/2018, No. of Pgs.: 1080, Court Reporter: Bebault, Carla R [4755267] [19-1079] (STL) [Entered: 02/11/2019 11:55 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Erwin O. Switzer for Appellant Mr. Gus Boosalis w/service 01/25/2019 [4749593] [19-1079] (EOS) [Entered: 01/25/2019 02:23 PM] |
| STATEMENT of issues/Certificate of Transcript/Method of Appendix filed by Appellant Mr. Gus Boosalis - w/service 01/24/2019. [4749001] [19-1079]--[Edited 01/25/2019 by LMT] (MAS) [Entered: 01/24/2019 11:43 AM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Mr. Douglas Arthur Kelley. - FOR CAL [4747273] [19-1079] (ABB) [Entered: 01/17/2019 08:54 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by J David Jackson for Appellee Mr. Douglas Arthur Kelley w/service 01/11/2019 [4745267] [19-1079] (JDJ) [Entered: 01/11/2019 03:54 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by John Marti for Appellee Mr. Douglas Arthur Kelley w/service 01/11/2019 [4745276] [19-1079] (RJZ) [Entered: 01/11/2019 04:00 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Andrew B. Brantingham for Appellee Mr. Douglas Arthur Kelley w/service 01/11/2019 [4745278] [19-1079] (ABB) [Entered: 01/11/2019 04:01 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Judgment 12/11/18 [4744715] [19-1079] (MMH) [Entered: 01/10/2019 03:40 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 02/19/2019. Appendix due 03/01/2019. BRIEF APPELLANT, Gus Boosalis due 03/01/2019 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. Appellant reply brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee brief. [4744724] [19-1079] (MMH) [Entered: 01/10/2019 03:44 PM] |
| Bankruptcy Case Docketed.[4744673] [19-1079] (MMH) [Entered: 01/10/2019 03:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Douglas A. Kelley v. Gus Boosalis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: Gus Boosalis | |
| Represented By: | Erwin O. Switzer III |
| Represented By: | Mark A. Schwab |
| Represented By: | Don R. Grande |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. Frisk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: Douglas Arthur Kelley, in his capacity as the PCI Liquidating Trustee for the PCI Liquidating Trust | |
| Represented By: | Lucas J. Olson |
| Represented By: | Christina Hanson |
| Represented By: | J. David Jackson |
| Represented By: | Andrew B. Brantingham |
| Represented By: | John Marti |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
