Andrew Turner v. Stan Payne, et al
| Miss Lindell, Nurse Counselor, Official Capacity, Miss Kopp, Chief Medical Health, Official Capacity, Michelle Dalton, Caseworker 5 H.U., Official Capacity, Miss Cruz, FUM 4 & 5 H.U., Official Capacity, Mr. Barker, Caseworker & Acting FUM 5 H.U., Official Capacity, Stan Payne, Warden, Official Capacity and Matthew Down, Investigator, Official Capacity |
| Andrew Howard Turner |
| 19-1080 |
| January 10, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Originating court document filed consisting of amended notice of appeal filed on 2/25/2019. [4761257] [19-1080] (CMH) [Entered: 02/28/2019 02:06 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating district court order of 02/01/2019 Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File A Notice of Appeal. [4754624] [19-1080] (CMH) [Entered: 02/08/2019 08:15 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit AND Inmate Account Statement, filed by Appellant Andrew Howard Turner w/service by USCA8 on 02/08/2019. [4754620] [19-1080] (CMH) [Entered: 02/08/2019 08:09 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Granting [ # 4750470-2 ] motion for extension of time to file application for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Andrew Howard Turner. [4750500] [19-1080] (CMH) [Entered: 01/29/2019 11:32 AM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent to Clerk of U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri forwarding appellant's motion for extension of time to file a late notice of appeal for initial ruling in the District Court. [4750483] [19-1080] (CMH) [Entered: 01/29/2019 11:14 AM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis AND to file a late notice of appeal until 03/01/2019, filed by Appellant Andrew Howard Turner w/service 01/29/2019. NOTE: The motion for extension of time to file a late notice of appeal will be forwarded to the U.S. District Court for a ruling. [4750470] [19-1080] (CMH) [Entered: 01/29/2019 11:03 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum & Order and Order both dated 12/3/2018, and memorandum & Order dated 1/10/2019. [4744861] [19-1080] (CMH) [Entered: 01/10/2019 05:13 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 02/07/2019, this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [4744865] [19-1080] (CMH) [Entered: 01/10/2019 05:15 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4744866] [19-1080] (CMH) [Entered: 01/10/2019 05:17 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4744854] [19-1080] (CMH) [Entered: 01/10/2019 04:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
