In re: DeMun Walker
Petitioner: In re: DeMun D. Walker
Case Number: 19-1216
Filed: January 31, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2019 CLERK ORDER:Denying as moot [ # 4762755-2 ] Motion to Prosecute the Relief Requested filed by Petitioner Mr. DeMun D. Walker. [4762758] [19-1216] (CMD) [Entered: 03/05/2019 01:49 PM]
March 5, 2019 MOTION "Prosecute the Relief Requested", filed by Petitioner Mr. DeMun D. Walker w/service by USCA8 02/25/2019. [4762755] [19-1216] (CMD) [Entered: 03/05/2019 01:46 PM]
February 19, 2019 DOCUMENT FILED - Affidavit in support of request to proceed ifp filed by Mr. DeMun D. Walker. w/service 02/19/2019 [4760709] [19-1216] (Crossed in mail with judgment previously granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis) (CMD) [Entered: 02/27/2019 01:22 PM]
February 14, 2019 JUDGMENT FILED - Granting [ # 4755558-2 ] motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Mr. DeMun D. Walker. Denying [ # 4751671-2 ] petition for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Mr. DeMun D. Walker. Mandate shall issue forthwith. DENIED. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER and DUANE BENTON Adp Feb 2019 [4756675] [19-1216] (CMD) [Entered: 02/14/2019 11:34 AM]
February 14, 2019 MANDATE ISSUED. [4756696] [19-1216] (CMD) [Entered: 02/14/2019 12:02 PM]
February 13, 2019 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Duane Benton in St. Louis [4756638] [19-1216] (CMD) [Entered: 02/14/2019 10:46 AM]
February 8, 2019 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Mr. DeMun D. Walker w/service by USCA8 on 02/12/2019. [4755561] [19-1216] (TMF) [Entered: 02/12/2019 08:52 AM]
February 8, 2019 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner Mr. DeMun D. Walker w/service by USCA8 on 02/12/2019. [4755558] [19-1216] (TMF) [Entered: 02/12/2019 08:48 AM]
February 7, 2019 CLERK ORDER: We are correcting our previous order dated 01/31/2019 which directed petitioner to pay the filing fee of $505 to the district court,[4751696-2]. The correction made was: Directing Petitioner to pay the filing fee of $500 or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with this court.[4754552] [4754552] [19-1216] (TMF) [Entered: 02/07/2019 03:49 PM]
January 31, 2019 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioner Mr. DeMun D. Walker w/service by USCA8 on 01/31/2019. [4751671] [19-1216] (TMF) [Entered: 01/31/2019 01:58 PM]
January 31, 2019 DOCUMENT LOCKED--PLEASE SEE CORRECTED ORDER DATED 02/07/2019 - CLERK ORDER: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 02/28/2019, this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [4751696] [19-1216][4751696] [19-1216]--[Edited 02/07/2019 by TMF] (TMF) [Entered: 01/31/2019 02:12 PM]
January 31, 2019 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [4751577] [19-1216] (TMF) [Entered: 01/31/2019 12:23 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: DeMun Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: DeMun D. Walker
Represented By: DeMun D. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?