Kenneth Dickerson, Jr. v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al
| Unknown Moss, Lieutenant, Charlene Deeken, Unknown Sheriff's Employee, Unknown Caseworker, Vernon Betts, City of St. Louis, Missouri, Jeff Carson, Unknown Montgomery, Sheriff's Deputy Montgomery, Dale Glass, Unknown Lieutenant, II and Unknown Lieutenant, I |
| Kenneth Dickerson, Jr. |
| Kimberly Gardner |
| 19-1360 |
| February 22, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CORRECTED brief of Ms. Kimberly Gardner submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4776195] [19-1360] (KLC) [Entered: 04/10/2019 11:47 AM] |
| Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Ms. Kelly Lynn Camilleri for Appellant Ms. Kimberly Gardner. [4776085] [19-1360] (MDS) [Entered: 04/10/2019 10:17 AM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Ms. Kimberly Gardner. w/service 04/10/2019 , Length: 4098 words. 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Kimberly Gardner due 04/15/2019 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs . Brief of Kenneth Dickerson Jr. due on 05/10/2019. [4776259] [19-1360] (MDS) [Entered: 04/10/2019 01:51 PM] |
| ADDENDUM of APPELLANT FILED by Appellant Ms. Kimberly Gardner , w/service 04/10/2019 [4776263] [19-1360] (MDS) [Entered: 04/10/2019 01:55 PM] |
| APPELLANT brief of Ms. Kimberly Gardner submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4773144] [19-1360] (KLC) [Entered: 04/02/2019 12:38 PM] |
| Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Ms. Kimberly Gardner. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [4773148] [19-1360] (KLC) [Entered: 04/02/2019 12:39 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - JOINT APPENDIX, 1 volumes, Location STL, Comments: 3 copies. [4774553] [19-1360] (MDS) [Entered: 04/05/2019 01:07 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Kelly L. Camilleri for Appellant Ms. Kimberly Gardner w/service 03/06/2019 [4763496] [19-1360] (KLC) [Entered: 03/06/2019 03:24 PM] |
| METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Ms. Kimberly Gardner - Joint Appendix - w/service 03/06/2019 [4763500] [19-1360] (KLC) [Entered: 03/06/2019 03:29 PM] |
| STATEMENT of issues filed by Appellant Ms. Kimberly Gardner - w/service 03/06/2019. [4763503] [19-1360] (KLC) [Entered: 03/06/2019 03:31 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [4758958] [19-1360] (CMH) [Entered: 02/22/2019 09:19 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum & Order dated 1/16/2019. [4758983] [19-1360] (CMH) [Entered: 02/22/2019 09:41 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 04/03/2019. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Kimberly Gardner due 04/03/2019. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. Appellant reply brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee brief. [4758985] [19-1360] (CMH) [Entered: 02/22/2019 09:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
