United States v. Roy Rodriguez
| Roy Rodriguez |
| United States of America |
| 19-1652 |
| March 28, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 06/03/2019, filed by Appellant Mr. Roy Rodriguez w/service 05/16/2019. [4788098] [19-1652] (SCM) [Entered: 05/16/2019 08:31 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 4788098-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Appellant Mr. Roy Rodriguez. Brief of Roy Rodriguez due 06/03/2019 [4788133] [19-1652] (LMT) [Entered: 05/16/2019 09:18 AM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 05/17/2019, filed by Attorney Mr. Stephen C. Moss for Appellant Mr. Roy Rodriguez w/service 04/25/2019. [4781223] [19-1652] (SCM) [Entered: 04/25/2019 09:54 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Stephen C. Moss for Appellant Mr. Roy Rodriguez w/service 04/25/2019 [4781191] [19-1652] (SCM) [Entered: 04/25/2019 09:29 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 4781223-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Stephen C. Moss. Brief of Roy Rodriguez due 05/17/2019 [4781318] [19-1652] (HAG) [Entered: 04/25/2019 10:44 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by James Curt Bohling for Appellee United States of America w/service 03/29/2019 [4772238] [19-1652] (JCB) [Entered: 03/29/2019 12:21 PM] |
| LETTER from Appellee United States of America regarding Removal of Randall D. Eggert as attorney of record. w/service 03/29/2019 [4772015] [19-1652] (RDE) [Entered: 03/29/2019 08:54 AM] |
| Criminal case docketed. -- [Edited 04/08/2019 by EDG to change from civil case docketed to criminal, letter with corrections was issued on 3/28/19] [4771746] [19-1652] (RLS) [Entered: 03/28/2019 01:49 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, orders dated 12/12/2017 and 03/12/2019 [4771753] [19-1652] (RLS) [Entered: 03/28/2019 01:56 PM] |
| CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: PSI report due 04/12/2019. Brief of appellant Roy Rodriguez due 04/26/2019. Appellee(s) brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Appellant reply brief is due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee's brief. [4771767] [19-1652] (RLS) [Entered: 03/28/2019 02:08 PM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent regarding apt of FPD. [4771872] [19-1652] (RLS) [Entered: 03/28/2019 03:30 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The Federal Public Defender is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this case. [4771889] [19-1652] (RLS) [Entered: 03/28/2019 03:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Roy Rodriguez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Roy Rodriguez | |
| Represented By: | Stephen C. Moss |
| Represented By: | Roy Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Byron H. Black |
| Represented By: | Cynthia Jean Hyde |
| Represented By: | James Curt Bohling |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
