Engineered Sales, Co. v. Endress + Hauser, Inc., et al
Defendant / Appellee: Miller Mechanical Specialties, Inc., an Iowa corporation and Endress + Hauser, Inc., an Indiana corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: Engineered Sales, Co., a Minnesota corporation
Case Number: 19-1671
Filed: March 29, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 17, 2020 Summary Engineered Sales, Co. v. Endress + Hauser, Inc.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2019 RECORD FILED - MOTION TRANSCRIPT, 1 volumes, Location STL, Comments: Copy do not return to the District Court at end of case, Source Location: USDC / MN, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 11/01/2018, No. of Pgs.: 35, Court Reporter: Rogge, Renee [4791173] [19-1671] (STL) [Entered: 05/24/2019 01:10 PM]
May 23, 2019 RECORD FILED - APLNT/PET APPENDIX, 1 volumes, Location STL, Comments: 3 COPIES [4790717] [19-1671] (JMM) [Entered: 05/23/2019 02:21 PM]
May 23, 2019 Paper copies Appellant/Petitioner Brief, [ # 4789605-2 ] filed by Engineered Sales, Co. 10 paper copies received. w/Addendum attached [4790712] [19-1671] (JMM) [Entered: 05/23/2019 02:19 PM]
May 21, 2019 ADDENDUM of APPELLANT FILED by Appellant Engineered Sales, Co. , w/service 05/21/2019 [4789606] [19-1671] (JMM) [Entered: 05/21/2019 09:51 AM]
May 21, 2019 BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Engineered Sales, Co.. w/service 05/21/2019 , Length: 12 pages 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Engineered Sales, Co. due 05/28/2019 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs Brief of Endress + Hauser, Inc. and Miller Mechanical Specialties, Inc. due on 06/20/2019 [4789605] [19-1671] (JMM) [Entered: 05/21/2019 09:51 AM]
May 20, 2019 Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Engineered Sales, Co.. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [4789180] [19-1671] (SM) [Entered: 05/20/2019 11:55 AM]
May 20, 2019 APPELLANT brief of Engineered Sales, Co. submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4789182] [19-1671] (SM) [Entered: 05/20/2019 11:58 AM]
April 10, 2019 METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Engineered Sales, Co. - Separate Appendix - w/service 04/10/2019 [4776215] [19-1671] (SM) [Entered: 04/10/2019 12:07 PM]
April 10, 2019 Certificate of transcript filed by Appellant Engineered Sales, Co.. Transcript ordered[4776212] [19-1671] (SM) [Entered: 04/10/2019 12:04 PM]
April 3, 2019 APPEARANCE filed by Andrew M. McNeil for Appellee Endress + Hauser, Inc. w/service 04/03/2019 [4773770] [19-1671] (AMM) [Entered: 04/03/2019 01:35 PM]
April 3, 2019 CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Endress + Hauser, Inc.. - FOR CAL [4773773] [19-1671] (AMM) [Entered: 04/03/2019 01:39 PM]
April 1, 2019 APPEARANCE filed by Steven Moore for Appellant Engineered Sales, Co. w/service 04/01/2019 [4772534] [19-1671] (SM) [Entered: 04/01/2019 10:05 AM]
April 1, 2019 CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellant Engineered Sales, Co.. - FOR CAL [4772539] [19-1671] (SM) [Entered: 04/01/2019 10:08 AM]
March 29, 2019 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal filed 3/26/2019, docket entries, order filed 2/27/2019, and judgment filed 2/28/2019. [4772339] [19-1671] (CBO) [Entered: 03/29/2019 03:08 PM]
March 29, 2019 BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 05/08/2019. Appendix due 05/20/2019. BRIEF APPELLANT, Engineered Sales, Co. due 05/20/2019 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. Appellant reply brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee brief. [4772341] [19-1671] (CBO) [Entered: 03/29/2019 03:10 PM]
March 29, 2019 Civil case docketed. [4772335] [19-1671] (CBO) [Entered: 03/29/2019 03:03 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Engineered Sales, Co. v. Endress + Hauser, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Miller Mechanical Specialties, Inc., an Iowa corporation
Represented By: Peter Jester Gleekel I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Endress + Hauser, Inc., an Indiana corporation
Represented By: Andrew M. McNeil
Represented By: Mark Joseph Carpenter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Engineered Sales, Co., a Minnesota corporation
Represented By: Steven Moore
Represented By: Danielle K. Nellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?