Carl Mouton v. Wendy Kelley
| Wendy Kelley |
| Carl Mouton |
| 19-1756 |
| April 11, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Re-mailed correspondence - case opening letter, [ # 4776668-2 ], clerk order pay docketing fee, [ # 4776691-2 ], clerk order case proceeding on of (need file), [ # 4776699-2 ], to Mr. Carl Mouton at TUCKER CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. [19-1756] (TMF) [Entered: 05/14/2019 12:17 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - SEALED RECORDS, Location STL, Comments: 1 envelope containing Sealed District Court document #10 [Copy do not return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / EA [4783190] [19-1756] (STL) [Entered: 05/01/2019 09:11 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Vada Berger for Appellee Ms. Wendy Kelley w/service 04/12/2019 [4777126] [19-1756] (VB) [Entered: 04/12/2019 09:09 AM] |
| UPDATED fee status - Fee paid to dist. ct., #21. [Case Number 19-1756: paid - cs] [4776803] [19-1756] (TMF) [Entered: 04/11/2019 01:39 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4776699] [19-1756] (TMF) [Entered: 04/11/2019 11:21 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal 4/10/19, docket entries, Findings & Recommendation 3/18/19, Order 4/4/19, Judgment 4/4/19. [4776689] [19-1756]--[Edited 04/11/2019 by TMF] (TMF) [Entered: 04/11/2019 11:14 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 05/02/2019, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [4776691] [19-1756] (TMF) [Entered: 04/11/2019 11:16 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4776668] [19-1756] (TMF) [Entered: 04/11/2019 10:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Carl Mouton v. Wendy Kelley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Wendy Kelley | |
| Represented By: | Vada Berger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Carl Mouton | |
| Represented By: | Carl Mouton |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey M. Rosenzweig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
