Clayton Franklin v. Franklin County, Arkansas, et al
Nicholas James, individually and in his capacity as a Franklin County Sheriff's Deputy, Anthony Boen, in his official capacity as Franklin County Sheriff, James Molton, Franklin County Sheriff Department, Franklin County, Arkansas and City of Ozark, AR |
Nathan Griffith and Joseph Griffith |
Clayton Franklin, as Administrator for the Estate of Cody J. Franklin |
19-1854 |
April 25, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Franklin v. Franklin County, Arkansas |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RECORD FILED - JOINT APPENDIX, 1 volumes, Comments: 3 sets , Source Location: St. Louis Record Deficiency due on 06/25/2019 - SEE ATTACHED NOTICE. [4800101] [19-1854] (HAG) [Entered: 06/20/2019 03:19 PM] |
On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions filed under [Rule 27], certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion for extension of time to file brief, [ # 4793012-2 ], submitted by Mr. Nathan Griffith and Mr. Joseph Griffith in 19-1854 , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [19-1854] (HAG) [Entered: 06/03/2019 09:31 AM] |
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Ms. Sara Lynn Monaghan for Appellants Mr. Joseph Griffith and Mr. Nathan Griffith correcting [ # 4793012-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Appellants. [4793312] [19-1854] (SLM) [Entered: 06/03/2019 09:58 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 4793012-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Appellants Mr. Nathan Griffith and Mr. Joseph Griffith. Brief of Joseph Griffith and Nathan Griffith due 07/03/2019. Appendix due on 07/03/2019. [4793448] [19-1854] (HAG) [Entered: 06/03/2019 01:15 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 07/03/2019, filed by Appellants Mr. Joseph Griffith and Mr. Nathan Griffith w/service 05/31/2019. [4793012] [19-1854] (SLM) [Entered: 05/31/2019 11:00 AM] |
Certificate of transcript filed by Appellants Mr. Joseph Griffith and Mr. Nathan Griffith. No Transcript[4786732] [19-1854] (SLM) [Entered: 05/10/2019 04:11 PM] |
DESIGNATION of record filed by Appellants Mr. Joseph Griffith and Mr. Nathan Griffith. w/service 05/10/2019 [4786729] [19-1854] (SLM) [Entered: 05/10/2019 04:08 PM] |
METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellants Mr. Joseph Griffith and Mr. Nathan Griffith - Joint Appendix - w/service 05/09/2019 [4786188] [19-1854] (SLM) [Entered: 05/09/2019 04:21 PM] |
STATEMENT of issues filed by Appellants Mr. Joseph Griffith and Mr. Nathan Griffith - w/service 05/09/2019. [4786186] [19-1854] (SLM) [Entered: 05/09/2019 04:17 PM] |
UPDATED fee status- paid. [Case Number 19-1854: paid - cs] [4785351] [19-1854] (RLS) [Entered: 05/08/2019 08:32 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, opinion dated 04/19/2019.[4781562] [19-1854] (RLS) [Entered: 04/25/2019 03:37 PM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 06/04/2019. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Joseph Griffith and Nathan Griffith due 06/04/2019. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. Appellant reply brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee brief. [4781563] [19-1854] (RLS) [Entered: 04/25/2019 03:38 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Sara Monaghan for Appellants Mr. Joseph Griffith and Mr. Nathan Griffith w/service 04/25/2019 [4781597] [19-1854] (SLM) [Entered: 04/25/2019 04:18 PM] |
Civil case docketed. [4781551] [19-1854] (RLS) [Entered: 04/25/2019 03:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.