Cody Howard v. Stephen King, et al
| Sheriff Jackie Runion, Miller County, Arkansas, Warden Jeffie Walker, Miller County Detention Facility and Dr. Timothy Reynolds |
| Cody Howard |
| Stephen King, Medical Team Administrator and Captain Golden, Miller County Detention Facility |
| 19-1983 |
| May 14, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER: APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Cody Howard due 07/11/2019. [4802548] [19-1983] (CMH) [Entered: 06/27/2019 11:57 AM] |
| Re-mailed correspondence - case opening letter , [ # 4787594-2 ], clerk letter regarding new caption, [ # 4787615-2 ], clerk order pay docketing fee, [ # 4787630-2 ],, clerk order case proceeding on of (need file), [ # 4787634-2 ], mailed to Appellant Mr. Cody Howard on 5/15/2019 was returned on 6/20/2019. Envelope marked "Return to Sender-Refused-Unable to Forward". Called Correctional Facility and was informed that Mr. Howard was released on 5/10/2019. No forwarding address is available and mail has not been re-sent. [19-1983] (CMH) [Entered: 06/21/2019 03:34 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Appellant Mr. Cody Howard was released from Miller County Correctional Facility on or about 5/10/2019. Appellant has not provided the Court with a new mailing address. The show cause order of 6/21/2019 is hereby dissolved. [4800592] [19-1983] (CMH) [Entered: 06/21/2019 03:45 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Cody Howard due 07/05/2019 [4800353] [19-1983] (CMH) [Entered: 06/21/2019 11:21 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4787634] [19-1983] (CMH) [Entered: 05/14/2019 04:50 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Report & Recommendations dated 3/15/2019, Order dated 4/2/2019, Amended Order dated 4/3/2019, Report & Recommendation dated 4/25/2019, ORder dated 5/8/2019 an Order dated 5/14/2019. [4787607] [19-1983] (CMH) [Entered: 05/14/2019 04:22 PM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent regarding new caption in case. [4787615] [19-1983] (CMH) [Entered: 05/14/2019 04:28 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 06/11/2019, this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [4787630] [19-1983] (CMH) [Entered: 05/14/2019 04:44 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4787594] [19-1983] (CMH) [Entered: 05/14/2019 04:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
