Michelle Palmer v. Commissioner, Social Security
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
Michelle Annette Palmer |
19-2032 |
May 21, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 4808671-2 ] motion extension of time to file administrative record and waive filing of the appendix filed by Appellant Ms. Michelle Annette Palmer. Administrative record due 07/30/2019. [4808693] [19-2032] (LMT) [Entered: 07/16/2019 03:34 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file the record until 07/30/2019 and waive filing of appendix, filed by Appellant Ms. Michelle Annette Palmer w/service 07/16/2019. [4808671] [19-2032]--[Edited 07/16/2019 by LMT] (GSW) [Entered: 07/16/2019 02:54 PM] |
REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Administrative record due 07/30/2019. Brief of Commissioner of Social Security Administration due 08/12/2019. [19-2032] (LMT) [Entered: 07/16/2019 03:42 PM] |
Paper copies Appellant/Petitioner Brief, [ # 4807224-2 ] filed by Ms. Michelle Annette Palmer 10 paper copies received. w/Addendum attached [4808057] [19-2032] (LMT) [Entered: 07/15/2019 12:18 PM] |
Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Ms. Michelle Annette Palmer. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [4807185] [19-2032] (GSW) [Entered: 07/11/2019 01:25 PM] |
ADDENDUM of APPELLANT FILED by Appellant Ms. Michelle Annette Palmer , w/service 07/11/2019 [4807218] [19-2032] (LMT) [Entered: 07/11/2019 02:14 PM] |
BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Ms. Michelle Annette Palmer. w/service 06/28/2019 , Length: 6377 words 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Michelle Annette Palmer due 07/16/2019 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs . Brief of Commissioner of Social Security Administration due on 08/12/2019 [4807224] [19-2032] (LMT) [Entered: 07/11/2019 02:22 PM] |
Addendum deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Mr. Gerald Scott Weinrich for Appellant Ms. Michelle Annette Palmer. New electronic copy of addendum due on 07/15/2019 [4806872] [19-2032] (LMT) [Entered: 07/10/2019 04:19 PM] |
Addendum deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Mr. Gerald Scott Weinrich for Appellant Ms. Michelle Annette Palmer. New electronic copy of addendum due on 07/08/2019 [4804188] [19-2032] (LMT) [Entered: 07/02/2019 02:11 PM] |
Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Mr. Gerald Scott Weinrich for Appellant Ms. Michelle Annette Palmer. [4803060] [19-2032] (LMT) [Entered: 06/28/2019 12:10 PM] |
APPELLANT brief of Ms. Michelle Annette Palmer submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4803018] [19-2032] (GSW) [Entered: 06/28/2019 11:38 AM] |
APPELLANT brief of Ms. Michelle Annette Palmer submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4803335] [19-2032] (GSW) [Entered: 06/28/2019 04:30 PM] |
THIS PREVIOUSLY FILED TRANSACTION - briefing schedule , Doc. No. [ # 4789570-2 ] - HAS BEEN MODIFIED. MODIFICATION MADE: (Pro Se language removed) [4797888] [19-2032] (CBO) [Entered: 06/14/2019 11:15 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by James D. Sides for Appellee Commissioner of Social Security Administration w/service 06/05/2019 [4794263] [19-2032] (JDS) [Entered: 06/05/2019 09:34 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal filed 5/13/2019, docket entries, order filed 3/22/2019, and judgment filed 3/25/2019. [4789565] [19-2032] (CBO) [Entered: 05/21/2019 09:20 AM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. Appellant reply brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee brief. [4789570] [19-2032]--[Edited 06/14/2019 by CBO] NDA BEING RE-SENT TO COUNSEL on 7/16/2019 with updated language--[Edited 07/16/2019 by CMW] (CBO) [Entered: 05/21/2019 09:25 AM] |
Civil case docketed. [4789556] [19-2032] (CBO) [Entered: 05/21/2019 09:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Michelle Palmer v. Commissioner, Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | James D. Sides |
Represented By: | Bahram Samie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Michelle Annette Palmer | |
Represented By: | Gerald Scott Weinrich |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.