Alan Doering v. Wendy Kelley, et al
| Alan Lewis Doering |
| Branch, Deputy Warden, Brickeys Unit, Dale Reed, Deputy Director, ADC, Correct Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley, Director, ADC, Cambell, APN, Brickeys Unit, Greg Rechcigl, Health Service Administrator, Brickeys Unit, Dycus, Deputy Warden, Brickeys Unit, Andrews, Warden, Brickeys Unit and Rory Griffin, Deputy Director, ADC |
| 19-2340 |
| June 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [4818973] [19-2340] (JPP) [Entered: 08/14/2019 10:09 AM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - letter from appellant regarding status of appeal filed by Mr. Alan Lewis Doering. w/service 07/17/2019 [4810566] [19-2340] (JPP) [Entered: 07/22/2019 04:41 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 19-2340: plra] [4809504] [19-2340] (JPP) [Entered: 07/18/2019 02:34 PM] |
| AMENDED JUDGMENT FILED by JUDGES LOKEN, BENTON, and ERICKSON amending the judgment of 07/16/2019 [ # 4806653-2 ]: [19-2340] Appellant's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is granted. The full $505.00 appellate filing and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. Appellant may pay the filing fee in installments in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b). The court remands the collection of those fees to the district court. This case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (JPP) [Entered: 07/18/2019 02:27 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. JAMES B. LOKEN, DUANE BENTON and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp July 2019 [4808509] [19-2340] [4808509] [19-2340]--[Edited 07/18/2019 by JPP - Reason: THIS JUDGMENT HAS BEEN REPLACED BY AMENDED JUDGMENT ENTERED JULY 18,2019.] (JPP) [Entered: 07/16/2019 11:27 AM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Duane Benton, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [4808508] [19-2340] (JPP) [Entered: 07/16/2019 11:24 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. Alan Lewis Doering w/service 07/10/2019. [4806653] [19-2340] (CMH) [Entered: 07/10/2019 12:52 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4801870] [19-2340] (AEV) [Entered: 06/26/2019 10:33 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Proposed Findings and Recommendations 5/4/19, Order 5/28/19, Order 6/21/19, docket entries, [4801882] [19-2340] (AEV) [Entered: 06/26/2019 10:40 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 07/24/2019, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [4801887] [19-2340] (AEV) [Entered: 06/26/2019 10:43 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4801890] [19-2340] (AEV) [Entered: 06/26/2019 10:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
