Cheryl Miller v. Apollo Endosurgery US, Inc., et al
| Allergan Inc., Apollo Endosurgery US, Inc. and Allergan Sales, LLC |
| Cheryl Miller |
| 19-2501 |
| July 18, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - This appeal was docketed in error after the district court granted the withdrawal of the notice of appeal. On the court's own motion, the appeal is dismissed. Mandate shall issue forthwith. DISMISSED [4809891] [19-2501] (YML) [Entered: 07/19/2019 12:52 PM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [4809894] [19-2501] (YML) [Entered: 07/19/2019 12:56 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 07/15/2019 Dismissal of appeal, [4809787] [19-2501] (RLS) [Entered: 07/19/2019 10:23 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 08/28/2019. Appendix due 09/09/2019. BRIEF APPELLANT, Cheryl Miller due 09/09/2019 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. Appellant reply brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee brief. [4809681] [19-2501] (RLS) [Entered: 07/19/2019 08:36 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, order dated 06/12/2019, judgment dated 06/12/2019, [4809679] [19-2501] (RLS) [Entered: 07/19/2019 08:35 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [4809669] [19-2501] (RLS) [Entered: 07/19/2019 08:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
