Daniel Hurlbut v. Arkansas Attorney General, et al
| University of Arkansas Medical Sciences, Little Rock Endocrinology Department |
| Keith Waddle, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC, Stieve, Doctor, Thomas Burns, General Counsel, ADC, Rory Griffin, Deputy Director, ADC, Gary Musselwhite, Warden, Grimes Unit, Maurice Culclager, Major, Grimes Unit, Roger Tims, Sergeant, Grimes Unit, Hardy, Law Library Supervisor, Grimes Unit, Arkansas Attorney General, Does, UAMS Endocrinology Department, Shurika Brown, Grievance Coordinator, Grimes Unit, WellPath, formerly known as Correct Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley, Director, ADC, Brent J. Eubanks, Attorney, Medical Defendants, Vincent P. France, Assistant Attorney General, Shelly Byers, Medical Grievance Coordinator, ADC, Correct Care Solutions, Medical Contractor, ADC, Dexter Payne, Deputy Director, ADC, Peter Amplo, Sergeant, Grimes Unit and G. Holland, Mailroom Supervisor, Grimes Unit |
| Daniel Bryce Hurlbut |
| 19-2504 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [4819116] [19-2504] (YML) [Entered: 08/14/2019 12:29 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. JANE KELLY, PASCO M. BOWMAN and DAVID R. STRAS Adp July 2019 [4811653] [19-2504] (YML) [Entered: 07/24/2019 03:38 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Partial Recommended Disposition 6/19/19, Order 7/2/19, Order 7/18/19, docket entries, [4809801] [19-2504] (AEV) [Entered: 07/19/2019 10:39 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4809797] [19-2504] (AEV) [Entered: 07/19/2019 10:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
