Harold Dykes v. Dan Redington
Petitioner: Harold S. Dykes
Respondent: Dan Redington, Warden
Case Number: 19-2530
Filed: July 23, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2019 PETITION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL) with Exhibits A - GG filed by Petitioner Mr. Harold S. Dykes w/service 07/23/2019. [4810903] [19-2530] (CMH) [Entered: 07/23/2019 11:53 AM]
July 23, 2019 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [4810898] [19-2530] (CMH) [Entered: 07/23/2019 11:49 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Harold Dykes v. Dan Redington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Harold S. Dykes
Represented By: Harold S. Dykes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dan Redington, Warden
Represented By: Habeas Unit Missouri Attorney General
Represented By: Stephen David Hawke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?