Roscoe Chambers v. David Loebsack
| David Loebsack, Congressman |
| Roscoe Chambers |
| 19-2643 |
| August 5, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - Appellant has failed to respond to the show cause order and the time for a response has expired. The full $505.00 appellate filing and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. The court remands the collection of those fees to the district court. This appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Mandate shall issue forthwith. [4837796] [19-2643] (JPP) [Entered: 10/03/2019 02:29 PM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [4837802] [19-2643] (JPP) [Entered: 10/03/2019 02:36 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees or file a motion with the appellate court to proceed in forma pauperis. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Roscoe Chambers due 09/24/2019 [4828468] [19-2643] (EDG) [Entered: 09/10/2019 08:30 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 09/03/2019, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [4815632] [19-2643] (TMF) [Entered: 08/05/2019 12:48 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal 7/16/19, docket entries, Order 7/08/19, Judgment 7/09/19. [4815618] [19-2643] (TMF) [Entered: 08/05/2019 12:33 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4815627] [19-2643] (TMF) [Entered: 08/05/2019 12:39 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4815595] [19-2643] (TMF) [Entered: 08/05/2019 11:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Roscoe Chambers v. David Loebsack | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: David Loebsack, Congressman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Roscoe Chambers | |
| Represented By: | Roscoe Chambers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
