Melissa Maras v. The Curators of the University, et al
Defendant / Appellee: Matthew P. Marten, in his individual and official capacity, Keith Herman, in his individual and official capacity, Timothy C. Riley-Tillman, in his individual and official capacity, R. Bowen Loftin, in his individual and official capacity, The Curators of the University of Missouri and Daniel L. Clay, in his individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant: Melissa A. Maras
Case Number: 19-2875
Filed: August 30, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 29, 2020 Summary Maras v. Curators of the University of Missouri

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2019 CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 4835552-2 ] motion ext of time to file document filed by Mr. Joel A. Poole, Mr. George Swearingen Smith, Ph. D. and Mr. Nicholas S Beydler. Appellant brief is due November 22, 2019. Appendix is due November 22, 2019. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [4835699] [19-2875] (NDW) [Entered: 09/27/2019 04:26 PM]
September 27, 2019 MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's and appellees' briefs until 09/27/2019[4835552], filed by Attorney Mr. George Swearingen Smith, Ph. D. for Appellant Ms. Melissa A. Maras and Mr. Nicholas S Beydler for Appellees Mr. Daniel L. Clay, Mr. Keith Herman, Mr. R. Bowen Loftin, Mr. Matthew P. Marten, Mr. Timothy C. Riley-Tillman and The Curators of the University of Missouri and Mr. Joel A. Poole for Appellees Mr. Daniel L. Clay, Mr. Keith Herman, Mr. R. Bowen Loftin, Mr. Matthew P. Marten, Mr. Timothy C. Riley-Tillman and The Curators of the University of Missouri w/service 09/27/2019. [4835552] [19-2875] (GSS) [Entered: 09/27/2019 01:38 PM]
September 20, 2019 Certificate of transcript filed by Appellant Ms. Melissa A. Maras. No Transcript[4833413] [19-2875] (GSS) [Entered: 09/20/2019 03:02 PM]
September 20, 2019 METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Ms. Melissa A. Maras - Separate Appendix - w/service 09/20/2019 [4833418] [19-2875] (GSS) [Entered: 09/20/2019 03:04 PM]
September 20, 2019 STATEMENT of issues filed by Appellant Ms. Melissa A. Maras - w/service 09/20/2019. [4833422] [19-2875] (GSS) [Entered: 09/20/2019 03:06 PM]
September 6, 2019 CLERK ORDER: Granting [ # 4827257-2 ] motion ext of time to file record notices filed by Mr. George Swearingen Smith, Ph. D. [4827598] [19-2875] (HAG) [Entered: 09/06/2019 10:13 AM]
September 5, 2019 APPEARANCE filed by george s. smith for Appellant Ms. Melissa A. Maras w/service 09/05/2019 [4827255] [19-2875] (GSS) [Entered: 09/05/2019 01:18 PM]
September 5, 2019 MOTION for extension of time to file record notices until 09/20/2019, filed by Attorney Mr. George Swearingen Smith, Ph. D. for Appellant Ms. Melissa A. Maras w/service 09/05/2019. [4827257] [19-2875]--[Edited to correct filing relief 09/05/2019 by AMT] (GSS) [Entered: 09/05/2019 01:22 PM]
September 5, 2019 On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions filed under [Rule 27], certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion ext of time to file document, [ # 4827257-2 ], submitted by Mr. George Swearingen Smith, Ph. D. in 19-2875, pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [19-2875] (HAG) [Entered: 09/05/2019 02:02 PM]
September 5, 2019 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Mr. George Swearingen Smith, Ph. D. for Appellant Ms. Melissa A. Maras correcting [ # 4827257-2 ] motion filed by Attorney. [4827379] [19-2875] (GSS) [Entered: 09/05/2019 02:53 PM]
August 30, 2019 Civil case docketed. [4825676] [19-2875] (CMH) [Entered: 08/30/2019 03:24 PM]
August 30, 2019 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order dated 7/30/2019 and Judgment dated 8/1/2019. [4825682] [19-2875] (CMH) [Entered: 08/30/2019 03:27 PM]
August 30, 2019 BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 10/09/2019. Appendix due 10/21/2019. BRIEF APPELLANT, Melissa A. Maras due 10/21/2019 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. Appellant reply brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee brief. [4825683] [19-2875] (CMH) [Entered: 08/30/2019 03:27 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Melissa Maras v. The Curators of the University, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Matthew P. Marten, in his individual and official capacity
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Represented By: Nicholas S. Beydler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Keith Herman, in his individual and official capacity
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Represented By: Nicholas S. Beydler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Timothy C. Riley-Tillman, in his individual and official capacity
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Represented By: Nicholas S. Beydler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: R. Bowen Loftin, in his individual and official capacity
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Represented By: Nicholas S. Beydler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: The Curators of the University of Missouri
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Represented By: Nicholas S. Beydler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Daniel L. Clay, in his individual and official capacity
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Represented By: Nicholas S. Beydler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Melissa A. Maras
Represented By: George Swearingen Smith Ph. D.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?