United States v. Justin Sholley-Gonzalez
| Justin Dwight Sholley-Gonzalez |
| United States of America |
| 19-2914 |
| September 5, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 United States v. Sholley-Gonzalez
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| LETTER from Appellant Mr. Justin Dwight Sholley-Gonzalez regarding Substitution of Counsel. w/service 09/06/2019 [4827538] [19-2914] (NDJ) [Entered: 09/06/2019 08:58 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Nova D. Janssen for Appellant Mr. Justin Dwight Sholley-Gonzalez w/service 09/05/2019 [4827353] [19-2914] (NDJ) [Entered: 09/05/2019 02:37 PM] |
| CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: PSI report due 09/24/2019. Transcript due 09/24/2019. Brief of appellant Justin Dwight Sholley-Gonzalez due 10/08/2019. Appellee(s) brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Appellant reply brief is due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee's brief. [4827220] [19-2914] (RLS) [Entered: 09/05/2019 12:27 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The Federal Public Defender is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this case. [4827217] [19-2914] (RLS) [Entered: 09/05/2019 12:23 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, judgment dated 08/21/2019 [4827199] [19-2914] (RLS) [Entered: 09/05/2019 12:04 PM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [4827195] [19-2914] (RLS) [Entered: 09/05/2019 11:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
