United States v. Erik Rodriguez-Venegas
| Erik Alejandro Rodriguez-Venegas |
| United States of America |
| 19-2941 |
| September 10, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: PSI report due 10/02/2019. Transcript due 10/02/2019. Brief of appellant Erik Alejandro Rodriguez-Venegas due 10/16/2019. Appellee's brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant's brief. Appellant reply brief is due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee's brief. [4829507] [19-2941, 19-2960] (CYZ) [Entered: 09/11/2019 04:53 PM] |
| CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due 10/01/2019. PSI report due 10/01/2019. Brief of appellant Erik Alejandro Rodriguez-Venegas due 10/15/2019. Appellee(s) brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Appellant reply brief is due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee's brief. [4828692] [19-2941] (CBO) [Entered: 09/10/2019 11:51 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Appointing Mr. Joshua D. Zellmer for Mr. Erik Alejandro Rodriguez-Venegas under the Criminal Justice Act. [4828683] [19-2941] (CBO) [Entered: 09/10/2019 11:46 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal filed 9/6/2019, docket entries, and judgment filed 8/27/2019. [4828676] [19-2941] (CBO) [Entered: 09/10/2019 11:38 AM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [4828668] [19-2941] (CBO) [Entered: 09/10/2019 11:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
