Ray Dansby v. Dexter Payne
| Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction |
| Ray Dansby |
| 19-3105 |
| October 1, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for extension of time to file response to Application, [ # 4847955-2 ], until 12/16/2019, filed by Mr. Christian Harris for Appellee Dexter Payne and Mr. Joseph Karl Luebke for Appellee Dexter Payne w/service 11/15/2019. [4852613] [19-3105] (CH) [Entered: 11/15/2019 11:22 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 4852613-2 ] motion for extension of time to file a response filed by Mr. Christian Harris and Mr. Joseph Karl Luebke. Response of Dexter Payne due 12/16/2019 [4852659] [19-3105] (AEV) [Entered: 11/15/2019 12:05 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 4848799-2 ] motion for extension of time to file a response filed by Mr. Joseph Karl Luebke. Response of Dexter Payne due 12/02/2019 [4849279] [19-3105] (AEV) [Entered: 11/05/2019 04:04 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file response to Application for certificate of appealability, [ # 4847955-2 ], until 12/02/2019, filed by Attorney Mr. Joseph Karl Luebke for Appellee Dexter Payne w/service 11/04/2019. [4848799] [19-3105]--[Edited 11/06/2019 by AEV] (JKL) [Entered: 11/04/2019 04:31 PM] |
| APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability, filed by Appellant Mr. Ray Dansby in 19-3105 w/service 10/31/2019 [4847955] [19-3105, 19-3006] (JPK) [Entered: 10/31/2019 06:32 PM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent regarding new caption in case. Party Wendy Kelley was replaced by Dexter Payne, the current Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction. [4841112] [19-3105, 19-3006] (AEV) [Entered: 10/11/2019 01:17 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Joseph Karl Luebke for Appellee Ms. Wendy Kelley w/service 10/02/2019 [4836940] [19-3105] (JKL) [Entered: 10/02/2019 09:53 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Christian Harris for Appellee Ms. Wendy Kelley w/service 10/02/2019 [4836944] [19-3105] (CH) [Entered: 10/02/2019 10:00 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Scott W Braden for Appellant Mr. Ray Dansby w/service 10/02/2019 [4836956] [19-3105] (SB) [Entered: 10/02/2019 10:08 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Jason Kearney for Appellant Mr. Ray Dansby w/service 10/02/2019 [4836974] [19-3105] (JPK) [Entered: 10/02/2019 10:17 AM] |
| Death Penalty case docketed. [19-3105] (AEV) [Entered: 10/01/2019 01:17 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of cross-appeal, Memorandum, Opinion, Order 8/21/19, Judgment 8/21/19, docket entries, [4836552] [19-3105] (AEV) [Entered: 10/01/2019 01:30 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The Federal Public Defender for the Eastern District of Arkansas is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this case. [4836556] [19-3105] (AEV) [Entered: 10/01/2019 01:31 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Ray Dansby is granted 30 days to file an application for a certificate of appealability on the cross-appeal in case No. 19-3105, or up to and including, October 31, 2019. The briefing schedule in case No. 19-3006 shall be held in abeyance pending a determination of the application for a certificate of appealability in case No. 19-3105. [4836604] [19-3006, 19-3105] (AEV) [Entered: 10/01/2019 02:16 PM] |
| METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Ms. Wendy Kelley in 19-3006 - Separate Appendix - w/service 10/01/2019 [4836637] [19-3006, 19-3105] (JKL) [Entered: 10/01/2019 02:38 PM] |
| Certificate of transcript filed by Appellant Ms. Wendy Kelley in 19-3006. No Transcript[4836639] [19-3006, 19-3105] (JKL) [Entered: 10/01/2019 02:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
