Pamela Bravebull v. United States
| United States of America |
| Pamela Lynn Bravebull |
| 19-3439 |
| November 13, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RECORD FILED - SEALED PSI REPORT, 1 volumes, Location STL, Comments: 1 volume, 3 copies of Sealed PSI Report and Statement of Reasons, Source Location: USDC / NDBI [4858225] [19-3439] (STL) [Entered: 12/04/2019 02:38 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - Declaration of Filing filed by Ms. Pamela Lynn Bravebull. w/service 12/03/2019 [4857522] [19-3439] (CYZ) [Entered: 12/03/2019 11:41 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Ms. Pamela Lynn Bravebull w/service 12/03/2019. [4857558] [19-3439] (CYZ) [Entered: 12/03/2019 12:14 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Appellant is directed to provide the court with a declaration under penalties of perjury or a notarized statement pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(c)(1)(A) stating the date in which the notice of appeal was deposited in the institutions internal mail system. Response of Pamela Lynn Bravebull due 12/05/2019 [4852061] [19-3439] (CYZ) [Entered: 11/14/2019 09:48 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 12/05/2019, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [4852048] [19-3439] (CYZ) [Entered: 11/14/2019 09:42 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, order of 9/3/2019, judgment of 9/3/2019 [4852036] [19-3439] (CYZ) [Entered: 11/14/2019 09:35 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4852039] [19-3439] (CYZ) [Entered: 11/14/2019 09:37 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4851989] [19-3439] (CYZ) [Entered: 11/14/2019 08:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Pamela Bravebull v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Gary Lee Delorme |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Pamela Lynn Bravebull | |
| Represented By: | Pamela Lynn Bravebull |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
