Mamadou Bella Balde v. William P. Barr
| Mamadou Bella Balde |
| William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States |
| 19-3494 |
| November 21, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Mamadou Bella Balde v. William P. Barr |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by Todd Cochran for Respondent Mr. William P. Barr w/service 11/22/2019 [4854724] [19-3494] (TJC) [Entered: 11/22/2019 05:44 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Khanh Ngoc Nguyen for Petitioner Mr. Mamadou Bella Balde w/service 11/21/2019 [4854468] [19-3494] (CYZ) [Entered: 11/21/2019 12:55 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Directing Mr. Carl H. McIntyre for Mr. William P. Barr to file a response to motion for stay of removal, [ # 4854460-2 ]. William P. Barr response due on 12/02/2019 [4854464] [19-3494] (CYZ) [Entered: 11/21/2019 12:52 PM] |
| MOTION for stay of removal with attached memorandum in support, filed by Attorney Mr. Khanh Ngoc Nguyen for Petitioner Mr. Mamadou Bella Balde w/service 11/21/2019. [4854460] [19-3494] (CYZ) [Entered: 11/21/2019 12:51 PM] |
| PETITION for Review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioner Mr. Mamadou Bella Balde w/service 11/21/2019 [4854437] [19-3494] (CYZ) [Entered: 11/21/2019 12:24 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner Mr. Mamadou Bella Balde w/service 11/21/2019. [4854455] [19-3494] (CYZ) [Entered: 11/21/2019 12:48 PM] |
| Agency case docketed [4854433] [19-3494] (CYZ) [Entered: 11/21/2019 12:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
