Mario Bailey v. New Age Distributing Inc.
| Mario Bailey, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| New Age Distributing Inc. |
| 19-3514 |
| November 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Mario Bailey v. New Age Distributing Inc. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CORRECTED certificate of service for Court Record, Doc No. [ # 4872104-2 ], filed by Appellant Mr. Mario Bailey [4872236] [19-3514] (JS) [Entered: 01/16/2020 04:11 PM] |
| CORRECTED certificate of service for Paper Brief, Doc No. [ # 4872093-2 ], filed by Appellant Mr. Mario Bailey [4872233] [19-3514] (JS) [Entered: 01/16/2020 04:09 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - APLNT/PET APPENDIX, 1 volumes, Location STL Record Deficiency due on 01/21/2020. [4872104] [19-3514] SEE ATTACHED NOTICE. (CMD) [Entered: 01/16/2020 02:23 PM] |
| Paper copies Appellant/Petitioner Brief, [ # 4870728-2 ] filed by Mr. Mario Bailey 10 copies paper copies received. w/Addendum attached Paper brief deficiency due 01/21/2020. SEE ATTACHED NOTICE. [4872093] [19-3514] (CMD) [Entered: 01/16/2020 02:17 PM] |
| ADDENDUM of APPELLANT FILED by Appellant Mr. Mario Bailey , w/service 01/13/2020 [4870729] [19-3514] (CMD) [Entered: 01/13/2020 03:56 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Mario Bailey. w/service 01/13/2020 , Length: 10,733 words 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Mario Bailey due 01/21/2020 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs. Brief of New Age Distributing Inc. due on 02/12/2020 [4870728] [19-3514] (CMD) [Entered: 01/13/2020 03:55 PM] |
| Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Mr. Mario Bailey. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [4870705] [19-3514] (JS) [Entered: 01/13/2020 03:33 PM] |
| Addendum deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Mr. Josh Sanford for Appellant Mr. Mario Bailey. New electronic copy of addendum due on 01/21/2020 [4870420] [19-3514] (CMD) [Entered: 01/13/2020 10:11 AM] |
| Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Mr. Mario Bailey. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [4870183] [19-3514] (JS) [Entered: 01/10/2020 03:30 PM] |
| APPELLANT brief of Mr. Mario Bailey submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4870181] [19-3514] (JS) [Entered: 01/10/2020 03:29 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - MOTION TRANSCRIPT, 1 volumes, Location STL, Comments: Copy do not return to the District Court at end of case, Source Location: USDC / EALR, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 06/04/2019, No. of Pgs.: 23, Court Reporter: Dellinger, Karen [4868895] [19-3514] (STL) [Entered: 01/08/2020 11:42 AM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 19-3514: paid - cs] [4859416] [19-3514] (CJO) [Entered: 12/06/2019 04:12 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - Receipt: Fee Paid to District Court. [4859408] [19-3514] (CJO) [Entered: 12/06/2019 04:07 PM] |
| STATEMENT of issues filed by Appellant Mr. Mario Bailey - w/service 12/06/2019. [4859032] [19-3514] (JS) [Entered: 12/06/2019 10:21 AM] |
| METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Mr. Mario Bailey - Separate Appendix - w/service 12/06/2019 [4859029] [19-3514] (JS) [Entered: 12/06/2019 10:18 AM] |
| Certificate of transcript filed by Appellant Mr. Mario Bailey. No Transcript[4859020] [19-3514] (JS) [Entered: 12/06/2019 10:08 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Josh Sanford for Appellant Mr. Mario Bailey w/service 12/06/2019 [4859008] [19-3514] (JS) [Entered: 12/06/2019 09:57 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order dated 11/21/2019, and Judgment dated 11/21/2019.[4855431] [19-3514] (CJO) [Entered: 11/25/2019 10:56 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 01/06/2020. Appendix due 01/14/2020. BRIEF APPELLANT, Mario Bailey due 01/14/2020 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [4855437] [19-3514] (CJO) [Entered: 11/25/2019 11:00 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [4855428] [19-3514] (CJO) [Entered: 11/25/2019 10:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mario Bailey v. New Age Distributing Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Mario Bailey, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Josh Sanford |
| Represented By: | Sean Short |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: New Age Distributing Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Dylan Botteicher |
| Represented By: | Brian A. Vandiver |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.