Corey Burgess v. Richard Jennings
| Corey Burgess |
| Richard Jennings, Warden |
| 19-3535 |
| November 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - The case is dismissed in accordance with Rule 42(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Mandate shall issue forthwith.; Granting [ # 4862571-2 ] motion to dismiss case filed by Appellant Mr. Corey Burgess. [4863437] [19-3535] (JPP) [Entered: 12/18/2019 03:13 PM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [4863454] [19-3535] (JPP) [Entered: 12/18/2019 03:26 PM] |
| MOTION to voluntarily dismiss case, filed by Appellant Mr. Corey Burgess w/service 12/06/2019 (originally filed in district court). [4862571] [19-3535] (AEV) [Entered: 12/17/2019 11:15 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Appellant Mr. Corey Burgess is directed to show cause, within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed as moot. Appellant filed a notice of appeal of an district court dismissal. The district courts dismissal has since been vacated. Response of Corey Burgess due 12/10/2019 [4856421] [19-3535]--[Edited 11/26/2019 by AEV] (AEV) [Entered: 11/26/2019 04:34 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4856351] [19-3535] (AEV) [Entered: 11/26/2019 03:50 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order 11/7/19, Order 11/14/19, docket entries, [4856348] [19-3535] (AEV) [Entered: 11/26/2019 03:48 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 12/17/2019, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [4856349] [19-3535] (AEV) [Entered: 11/26/2019 03:48 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4856344] [19-3535] (AEV) [Entered: 11/26/2019 03:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Corey Burgess v. Richard Jennings | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Corey Burgess | |
| Represented By: | Corey Burgess |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Richard Jennings, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Caroline Marie Coulter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
