United States v. George Khalil
George Khalil |
United States of America |
19-3612 |
December 6, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK LETTER sent returning Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Rehearing. [4891978] [19-3612] (NDG) [Entered: 03/17/2020 09:34 AM] |
JUDGE ORDER:Denying as untimely [ # 4877438-2 ] petition for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Mr. George Khalil. Adp Dec 2019 [4885544] [19-3612] (CMD) [Entered: 02/27/2020 10:07 AM] |
PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Mr. George Khalil w/service by USCA8 02/03/2020 [4877438] [19-3612] (CMD) [Entered: 02/03/2020 02:37 PM] |
MANDATE ISSUED. [4873868] [19-3612] (CMD) [Entered: 01/23/2020 09:48 AM] |
JUDGE ORDER: The motion for extension of time to file a petition for rehearing and for appointment of counsel is denied. [ # 4870653-2 ] Adp Dec 2019 [4871522] [19-3612] (AMT) [Entered: 01/15/2020 11:09 AM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file petition for rehearing until 03/09/2020, for appointment of counsel, filed by Appellant Mr. George Khalil w/service by USCA8 01/13/2020. [4870653] [19-3612] (CMD) [Entered: 01/13/2020 02:40 PM] |
DOCUMENT FILED - Letter to Clerk filed by Mr. George Khalil w/service 12/27/2019 by USCA8. No action taken as case is dismissed as untimely. [4865905] [19-3612] (NDG) [Entered: 12/27/2019 03:35 PM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - Case dismissed as untimely filed. JAMES B. LOKEN, DUANE BENTON and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp Dec 2019 [4865271] [19-3612] (NDG) [Entered: 12/26/2019 10:57 AM] |
RESPONSE in support of judge order showcause [ # 4860642-2 ], judge order [ # 4860642-3 ] filed by Attorney Mr. Stephen C. Moss for Appellant Mr. George Khalil , w/service 12/19/2019. [4863609] [19-3612] (SCM) [Entered: 12/19/2019 09:11 AM] |
CLERK ORDER: The Federal Public Defender is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this case. [4860624] [19-3612] (CMH) [Entered: 12/11/2019 10:08 AM] |
JUDGE ORDER: Appellant Mr. George Khalil is directed to show cause, within 14 days of the date of this order, why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. Response of George Khalil due 12/26/2019. Adp Dec 2019 [4860642] [19-3612] (CMH) [Entered: 12/11/2019 10:30 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Stephen C. Moss for Appellant Mr. George Khalil w/service 12/11/2019 [4860643] [19-3612] (SCM) [Entered: 12/11/2019 10:31 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Judgment dated 9/5/2019. [4859330] [19-3612] (CMH) [Entered: 12/06/2019 03:09 PM] |
CRIMINAL case docketed. [4859312] [19-3612] (CMH) [Entered: 12/06/2019 03:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: United States v. George Khalil | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: George Khalil | |
Represented By: | Stephen C. Moss |
Represented By: | George Khalil |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Patrick Edwards |
Represented By: | Matthew A. Moeder |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.