Joel Munt v. Tom Roy, et al
Susan Norton, Victor Wanchena, Lisa Cox, Eddie Miles, Chris Pawelk, Steven Hammer, Mike Warner, Joel Marvin Munt and Tom Roy |
19-8007 |
February 27, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
PETITION for enbanc rehearing and also for rehearing by panel filed by Petitioner Mr. Joel Marvin Munt w/service 04/03/2019 [4777037] [19-8007] (YML) [Entered: 04/11/2019 04:41 PM] |
MANDATE ISSUED. [4771819] [19-8007] (YML) [Entered: 03/28/2019 02:42 PM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - The petition for permission to appeal has been considered and is denied. The appeal is dismissed. The appeal is deemed a strike under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(g). The mandate shall issue forthwith. [ # 4760605-2 ] JAMES B. LOKEN, RAYMOND W. GRUENDER and DUANE BENTON Adp Apr 2019 [4771789] [19-8007] (YML) [Entered: 03/28/2019 02:23 PM] |
CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Raymond W. Gruender, Duane Benton in St. Louis [4771772] [19-8007] (YML) [Entered: 03/28/2019 02:13 PM] |
RESPONSE in opposition to petition [ # 4760605-2 ] filed by Attorney Ms. Rachel E. Bell-Munger for Respondents Ms. Lisa Cox, Steven Hammer, Mr. Eddie Miles, Ms. Susan Norton, Mr. Chris Pawelk, Tom Roy, Mr. Victor Wanchena and Mr. Mike Warner , w/service 03/08/2019. [4764614] [19-8007] (REB) [Entered: 03/08/2019 03:45 PM] |
PETITION for Permission to Appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1292(b). (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioner Mr. Joel Marvin Munt w/service 02/27/2019 [4760605] [19-8007] (CBO) [Entered: 02/27/2019 11:14 AM] |
Miscellaneous case docketed. [4760603] [19-8007] (CBO) [Entered: 02/27/2019 11:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.