Jeremy Rothe-Kushel v. Brent Parsons
| Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City, Don Wagner, In his official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners, Blair Howell Hawkins, Kim Rausch, Director of Development, Truman Library Institute, Michael Satter, In his individual capacity, Mayor Sylvester "Sly" James, In his official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners, Joshua Stein, Director of Fund Development, Jewish Community Foundation, Leland Shurin, In his official capacity as President and a member of the Board of Police Commissioners, Lauren Hoopes, Executive Director, Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City, Detective Michael Curley, In his individual capacity, Chief Richard C. Smith, In his official capacity, Mark Tolbert, In his official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners and Nathan F. Garrett, In his official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners |
| Detective Brent Parsons, In his individual capacity |
| Jeremy Rothe-Kushel |
| 20-1418 |
| March 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Jeremy Rothe-Kushel v. Brent Parsons |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
RECORD RETURNED - EXHIBITS, Comments: 1 envelope containing Video Exhibit (Plaintiff's Exhibit #20 - DVD) - District Court document #233 [Return to the District Court at end of case], SENT -END OF CASE [5065802] [20-1418] (JJF) [Entered: 08/16/2021 10:51 AM]
|
|
MANDATE ISSUED. [5057320] [20-1418] (CMD) [Entered: 07/21/2021 03:34 PM]
|
|
JUDGE ORDER: Denying [ # 5047887-2 ] petition for enbanc rehearing filed by Appellant Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel. The petition for panel rehearing is also denied. Scrg May 2021 [5054683] [20-1418] (CMD) [Entered: 07/14/2021 11:55 AM]
|
|
PETITION for enbanc rehearing and also for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel w/service 06/22/2021 [5047887] [20-1418] (JR) [Entered: 06/22/2021 10:50 PM]
|
|
CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5041540-2 ] motion for extension of time to file rehearing filed by Appellant Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel. Petition for Rehearing due on 06/22/2021 [5041655] [20-1418] (CMD) [Entered: 06/03/2021 10:42 AM]
|
|
MOTION for extension of time to file petition for rehearing until 06/22/2021, filed by Party Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel w/service 06/02/2021. [5041540] [20-1418] (JR) [Entered: 06/02/2021 09:04 PM]
|
|
JUDGMENT FILED - The judgment of the Originating Court is AFFIRMED in accordance with the opinion RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, ROGER L. WOLLMAN and RALPH R. ERICKSON Scrg May 2021 [5038837] [20-1418] (CMD) [Entered: 05/25/2021 09:02 AM]
|
|
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Raymond W. Gruender, Roger L. Wollman and Ralph R. Erickson (UNPUBLISHED) [5038830] [20-1418] (CMD) [Entered: 05/25/2021 08:58 AM]
|
|
CASE SUBMITTED Screening Case Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Roger L. Wollman, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [5036710] [20-1418] (CMD) [Entered: 05/18/2021 11:25 AM]
|
|
RECORD FILED - EXHIBITS, Comments: 1 envelope containing Video Exhibit (Plaintiff's Exhibit #20 - DVD) - District Court document #233 [Return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / WMKC [4999126] [20-1418] (STL) [Entered: 01/28/2021 04:13 PM]
|
|
BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT REPLY BRIEF filed by Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel. w/service 10/20/2020 , Length: 6,474 words [4967217] [20-1418] (CMD) [Entered: 10/20/2020 08:59 AM]
|
|
REPLY brief of Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4967104] [20-1418] (JR) [Entered: 10/19/2020 03:49 PM]
|
|
Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Party Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel. [4965216] [20-1418] (CMD) [Entered: 10/14/2020 09:49 AM]
|
|
REPLY brief of Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4965132] [20-1418] (JR) [Entered: 10/13/2020 11:05 PM]
|
|
CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 4958847-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Appellant Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel. Reply brief of Jeremy Rothe-Kushel due 10/13/2020 [4958930] [20-1418] (CMD) [Entered: 09/24/2020 09:32 AM]
|
|
MOTION for extension of time to file reply brief until 10/13/2020. filed by Party Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel w/service 09/23/2020. [4958847] [20-1418] (Edited to reflect correct relief)--[Edited 09/24/2020 by CMD] (JR) [Entered: 09/23/2020 11:01 PM]
|
|
PUBLIC DOCKET NOTE: The due date for appellant's reply is set for September 29, 2020. [4954773] [20-1418] (CMD) [Entered: 09/11/2020 11:16 AM]
|
|
Paper copies Appellee/Respondent brief, [ # 4953202-2 ] filed by Brent Parsons 10 paper copies received. w/Addendum attached [4955039] [20-1418] (CRJ) [Entered: 09/11/2020 03:54 PM]
|
|
BRIEF FILED - APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Brent Parsons, Appellant's reply brief deadline will be set, based on the Certificate of Service in appellee's paper brief. w/service 09/08/2020 , Length: 3,806 words 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Brent Parsons due 09/14/2020 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs [4953202] [20-1418] (CMD) [Entered: 09/08/2020 11:01 AM]
|
|
APPELLEE brief of Brent Parsons submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4953037] [20-1418] (NT) [Entered: 09/08/2020 08:20 AM]
|
|
APPELLEE brief of Brent Parsons submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4952916] [20-1418] (NT) [Entered: 09/04/2020 03:56 PM]
|
|
Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Mr. Nicolas Taulbee for Appellee Brent Parsons. [4952934] [20-1418] (BNW) [Entered: 09/04/2020 04:24 PM]
|
|
Addendum of APPELLEE submitted for review by Brent Parsons. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [4952917] [20-1418]--[Edited 09/04/2020 by CRJ. This entry was edited to correct party for the addendum.] (NT) [Entered: 09/04/2020 03:57 PM]
|
|
ADDENDUM of APPELLEE FILED by Appellee Brent Parsons w/service 09/04/2020. [4952937] [20-1418] (BNW) [Entered: 09/04/2020 04:28 PM]
|
|
Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [4942146] [20-1418] (JR) [Entered: 08/05/2020 12:06 AM]
|
|
ADDENDUM of APPELLANT FILED by Appellant Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel , w/service 08/05/2020 [4942172] [20-1418] (LMT) [Entered: 08/05/2020 08:38 AM]
|
|
BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel. w/service 08/04/2020 , Length: 12,826 words - 5 copies Brief of Brent Parsons due on 09/04/2020 [4942182] [20-1418] Edited to reflect pro se appeal and no paper brief copies required.--[Edited 08/05/2020 by LMT] (LMT) [Entered: 08/05/2020 08:45 AM]
|
|
APPELLANT brief of Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4942145] [20-1418] (JR) [Entered: 08/04/2020 11:58 PM]
|
|
Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Party Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel. [4940167] [20-1418] (CMD) [Entered: 07/30/2020 02:44 PM]
|
|
APPELLANT brief of Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4939819] [20-1418] (JR) [Entered: 07/29/2020 11:59 PM]
|
|
CLERK ORDER:Granting in Part [ # 4929708-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Appellant Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel [4929710] Brief of Jeremy Rothe-Kushel due 07/29/2020 [4929710] [20-1418] (NDG) [Entered: 07/01/2020 04:20 PM]
|
|
MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 08/13/2020, filed by Appellant Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel w/service 07/01/2020 by USCA8. [4929708] [20-1418] (NDG) [Entered: 07/01/2020 04:18 PM]
|
|
REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. Brief of Jeremy Rothe-Kushel due 06/29/2020 [20-1418] (CMD) [Entered: 05/28/2020 03:21 PM]
|
| CLERK ORDER: Appellant's lawyers have moved for leave to withdraw, and Mr. Arthur Benson, Ms. Jamie Kathryn Lansford and Mr. Fred Slough are granted leave to withdraw. The appeal will be held in abeyance for 45 days to permit appellant to retain new counsel and have this new lawyer enter an appearance in the matter. If a new attorney enters an appearance within the time permitted, the court will establish a new briefing schedule. If an attorney does not enter an appearance within 45 days, the clerk will treat the appeal as a pro se case and set a pro se briefing schedule. [ # 4900195-2 ] [ # 4900195-3 ] [ # 4900195-4 ] [4900826] [20-1418] (LMT) [Entered: 04/09/2020 10:04 AM] |
| MOTION for extension of time of entire briefing schedule [4900195], to withdraw as retained counsel and substitute a new attorney, filed by Mr. Arthur Benson for Appellant Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel, Ms. Jamie Kathryn Lansford for Appellant Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel and Mr. Fred Slough for Appellant Mr. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel w/service 04/07/2020. [4900195] [20-1418]--[Edited 04/08/2020 by LMT] Edited to reflect all relief sought [4900195] [20-1418]--[Edited 04/08/2020 by LMT] (JKL) [Entered: 04/07/2020 04:44 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Nicolas Taulbee for Appellee Brent Parsons w/service 04/01/2020 [4897801] [20-1418] (NT) [Entered: 04/01/2020 07:39 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order and Opinion 1/30/20, Judgment 1/30/20, docket entries, [4886676] [20-1418] (AEV) [Entered: 03/02/2020 12:21 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 04/13/2020. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Jeremy Rothe-Kushel due 04/13/2020. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [4886677] [20-1418] (AEV) [Entered: 03/02/2020 12:21 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [4886674] [20-1418] (AEV) [Entered: 03/02/2020 12:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jeremy Rothe-Kushel v. Brent Parsons | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Don Wagner, In his official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Blair Howell Hawkins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kim Rausch, Director of Development, Truman Library Institute | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael Satter, In his individual capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mayor Sylvester "Sly" James, In his official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Joshua Stein, Director of Fund Development, Jewish Community Foundation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Leland Shurin, In his official capacity as President and a member of the Board of Police Commissioners | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lauren Hoopes, Executive Director, Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Detective Michael Curley, In his individual capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chief Richard C. Smith, In his official capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mark Tolbert, In his official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nathan F. Garrett, In his official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Detective Brent Parsons, In his individual capacity | |
| Represented By: | Nicolas Taulbee |
| Represented By: | Diane Peters |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Jeremy Rothe-Kushel | |
| Represented By: | Fred Slough |
| Represented By: | Arthur Benson |
| Represented By: | Jamie Kathryn Lansford |
| Represented By: | Jeremy Rothe-Kushel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
