Wayne Gerling v. Matthew Waite
| Frank Tennant, individually and in his official capacity as Police Chief of the Hermann, Missouri, Police Department and City of Hermann, Missouri |
| Wayne Gerling |
| Matthew Waite, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the Herman, Missouri, Police Department |
| 20-1528 |
| March 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by Jonathan Weinberg for Appellee Mr. Wayne Gerling w/service 05/06/2020 [4910450] [20-1528] (JW) [Entered: 05/06/2020 02:36 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Paul Alessio Mezzina for Appellee Mr. Wayne Gerling w/service 05/06/2020 [4910440] [20-1528] (PAM) [Entered: 05/06/2020 02:26 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 4902581-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Ryan Eugene Bertels. Brief of Matthew Waite due 05/21/2020. Appendix due on 05/21/2020. [4902709] [20-1528] (LMT) [Entered: 04/15/2020 08:10 AM] |
| On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions/petitions filed under [Rule 27 - MOTIONS], certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion/petition did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion for extension of time to file brief, [ # 4902581-2 ], submitted by Mr. Ryan Eugene Bertels in 20-1528 , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [20-1528] (LMT) [Entered: 04/14/2020 03:51 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 05/21/2020, filed by Attorney Mr. Ryan Eugene Bertels for Appellant Mr. Matthew Waite w/service 04/14/2020. [4902581] [20-1528] (REB) [Entered: 04/14/2020 03:38 PM] |
| CORRECTED/INITIAL certificate of service and compliance statment for motion, Doc No. [ # 4902581-2 ], filed by Appellant Mr. Matthew Waite [4902679] [20-1528]--[Edited 04/15/2020 by LMT] (REB) [Entered: 04/14/2020 04:58 PM] |
| METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Mr. Matthew Waite - Joint Appendix - w/service 03/24/2020 [4895069] [20-1528] (REB) [Entered: 03/24/2020 02:55 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Patrick R. McPhail for Appellee Mr. Wayne Gerling w/service 03/18/2020 [4892599] [20-1528] (PRM) [Entered: 03/18/2020 10:17 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Kevin M. Carnie, Jr. for Appellee Mr. Wayne Gerling w/service 03/18/2020 [4892595] [20-1528] (KMC) [Entered: 03/18/2020 10:12 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by David J. Welder for Appellee Mr. Wayne Gerling w/service 03/18/2020 [4892816] [20-1528] (DJW) [Entered: 03/18/2020 01:23 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Ryan Bertels for Appellant Mr. Matthew Waite w/service 03/16/2020 [4891832] [20-1528] (REB) [Entered: 03/16/2020 04:11 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Chris Rackers for Appellant Mr. Matthew Waite w/service 03/16/2020 [4891840] [20-1528] (CPR) [Entered: 03/16/2020 04:21 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [4890848] [20-1528] (CAH) [Entered: 03/12/2020 03:54 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, memorandum and order 12/20/19, partial judgment 12/20/19, memorandum and order 2/10/20. [4890851] [20-1528] (CAH) [Entered: 03/12/2020 03:58 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 04/21/2020. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Matthew Waite due 04/21/2020. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [4890854] [20-1528] (CAH) [Entered: 03/12/2020 03:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Wayne Gerling v. Matthew Waite | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: Wayne Gerling | |
| Represented By: | Kevin M. Carnie Jr. |
| Represented By: | Patrick R. McPhail |
| Represented By: | John G. Simon |
| Represented By: | David Joseph Welder |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Weinberg |
| Represented By: | Paul Alessio Mezzina |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Frank Tennant, individually and in his official capacity as Police Chief of the Hermann, Missouri, Police Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Hermann, Missouri | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Matthew Waite, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the Herman, Missouri, Police Department | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Perry Rackers |
| Represented By: | Ryan Eugene Bertels |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.